When this year’s Hugo short list contained three books marketed as YA a lot of people complained about “dumbing down” and the like. That’s by no means necessarily the case. A book written for teenagers can be just as complex, if not more so, than a book written for adults. However, the writing in YA books is often very straightforward and transparent. Gene Wolfe could probably get away with writing like Gene Wolfe for a teenage audience, but if he was an unknown it is unlikely that he’d be able to sell such a book. And when you read a YA book that is straightforward and transparent you never quite know whether it being so is evidence of lack of skill on behalf of the writer, a conscious decision on behalf of the writer, or something that the writer has been bullied into by her editor.
All of which is necessary preamble to saying that I sped fairly quickly through Malinda Lo’s Ash because once you know the basic conceit (it is a lesbian re-telling of Cinderella) the book is straightforward and transparent. You know who all of the characters are, and what is going to happen, and Lo tells that story in a simple manner. That doesn’t mean it is a bad book. Indeed, it was cute and entertaining. And let’s face it, who would want Prince Charming when the most Charming thing about him is his wealth, especially if you could have his seriously sexy huntress instead?
So Ash is a fun book, and a good book for broadening the minds of young girls who might otherwise be reading Twilight and mooning over sexy vampires. It is very promising for a first novel. Malinda Lo isn’t in the same class as Robin McKinley yet, but give her time, or simply ask her to write for adults, and she may well be.
Well, my local library has Gene Wolfe’s The Knight and The Wizard shelved in the young adult section.
Ahem. Pandora by Holly Hollander by Gene Wolfe. He;s been there and done that.
I’ll probably give this one a miss, but for all the people who complain of dumbing down, besides claiming complexity, one can say this: in YA, folks don’t seem to get away with as much rampant padding as you see in a lot of books for adults as well . . . *sigh*
Last night during a chat (online) with Naomi Novik and Scott Westerfeld, Scott said he thought the difference between YA and adult fiction is (paraphrased) that YA explores the “who am I” theme and that much of science fiction concerns this theme as well.
To which I opined that in science fiction, the difference is less about theme and almost exclusively about the age of the protagonist. I think in SF that’s probably most of the difference, with some “YA” (based on protag age) stories slipping through and being put in the adult category.
[and no, I’m not meaning to drop names – this was a publisher organized public chat]
Kathryn: Thank you!