The Tiptree Question

Several weeks ago, before my life got plunged into chaos by a panic project at work, David Moles asked me to write about this year’s Tiptree Award. I have finally got around to finishing the article, and you can find it here. Profuse apologies to David for taking so long to produce it.

Although I still have some web sites to finish (and other that could always do with more work), I think I am now all caught up on writing projects, so if anyone wants to suggest some new Challenge Cheryl questions, please go ahead and do so. I shall do my best to try to answer them.

Garcia on the Hugos and Gambling

The latest issue of Chris Garcia’s The Drink Tank is an extended look at this year’s Hugo nominees. It is mainly by Chris, with guest comment from Niall Harrison. Being up for two fan Hugos himself, Chris majors on the fan categories. He says very kind things about me, for which I am very grateful (beer later, Chris, it will be flat if I send it from here), and offers the absurd odds of 5-1 on my winning. If it was 500-1 I might put some money on me, on the grounds that if I did win then I’d also come into enough money to hide away from the hordes of angry Scalzi fans for the rest of my life. But actually Chris doesn’t quite have his math right.

Those of us who have worked in for a bookmaker (it was a vacation job while I was in college), or indeed in commodity trading, are a little sharper. Chris is offering 2-1 on Scalzi and 3-1 on Langford. So if I put $1000 on each of them I’ll be fine. If Scalzi wins I break even, and if Langford wins I make $1000 profit. Alternatively I could put $2000 on Scalzi and $1000 on Langford. Then if Scalzi wins I get $4000 from him and lose $1000 on Dave, netting $3000; whereas if Dave wins I get $3000 from him and lose $2000 on John, netting $1000. Making money from gambling is quite easy of the bookie doesn’t get him odds right.

Of course you might argue that it is not certain that one of Scalzi and Langford will win. And if you do I will also argue that it is not certain that we won’t all wake up tomorrow and discover that we are all characters in a Charlie Stross virtual novel being played by a gang of adolescent squid on a giant artificial habitat orbiting the planet Ambergris.

Guardian at the Clarke

The Guardian has not one, but two reports from the Clarke Award ceremony. This is progress, even if Sam didn’t quite realize that the event was taking place in the middle of Sci-Fi London.

Sam’s reports of conversations with the jury sound like it was very much a typical Clarke Award with much debate happening behind closed doors. Good to see that the jurors were working hard.

Many congratulations to Richard. I’ve not read Black Man / Thirteen yet, but Abigail Nussbaum makes it sound very interesting. And not to worry, Mr. Scalzi, I don’t think this presages a shock sweep of awards by people named Morgan in 2008.

Locus Awards Finalists

A few quick words on the top five finishers, which have just been posted.

  • The SF novel and Fantasy novel categories contain all five of my Hugo Best Novel picks.
  • I’m delighted to see Night Shade and Subterranean in the Best Publisher list.
  • Two Brits and an Australian in Best YA novel – watch out for people asking whether the Locus Convention was held outside the US this year.

Whatever Next? Me, Apparently

A few days ago John Scalzi emailed me with an offer to provide space on Whatever for myself and the other Best Fan Writer nominees to show our wares to the world. That was extremely kind of him, and I have taken him up on the offer. I know this is very unlikely, but if there are some of you who read this blog but don’t read Whatever, you’ll need a link to see what I said. My post is here.

GeekPunk – the New Trend?

A while back on SF Awards Watch we posted about The Brief Wonderful Life of Oscar Wao, a book which today has been revealed as the winner of this year’s Pulitzer Prize for fiction. From the novella published in The New Yorker it does seem like Junot Díaz is a really good writer, but equally poor Oscar is a really pathetic nerd. I mean, Blake’s 7??? (That will get me into trouble.)

Anyway, it appears that Díaz is not alone, and if the New York Times can use the deaths of two old men who happen to blog as proof that blogging is bad for your health then surely I can use two books about nerds to claim evidence of a startling new trend in mainstream literature.

The other book is All Shall Be Well; and All Shall Be Well; and All Manner of Things Shall Be Well (yes, that is the title) by Tod Wodicka. There’s more about it on GalleyCat, but the important evidence is as follows:

Burt, the novel’s protagonist, is a vehemently faithful medieval reenactor, who dresses in handmade garb and refuses to drink coffee because it’s “out of period.” He tries to give up all his possessions and journey to Prague to reconcile with his estranged son, but don’t let your sympathy build up just yet. “I wanted Burt to be an unlikable asshole,” Wodicka says, “and in the earlier drafts, he was even more of one than he is now.”

(Note to Mr. Scalzi – I think “Burt” is the character’s first name, though I could be wrong.)

So there you have it. Two data points, so it must indicate a new literary movement, right? As to why? Well, obviously some of these mainstream types are running scared. They have seen how successful SF is these days, and how other mainstream authors are using SF themes in their work in a desperate attempt to stay relevant in today’s technology-obsessed world. Rather than give up and join the flow, they are busily writing books about how awful those SF types are in a desperate attempt to turn the tide.

Well, that’s my theory anyway, and I think it holds up at least as well as the NYT one about the dangers of blogging does (if not a lot more so). Now if you’ll excuse me I’m off to write a proposal for a novel about a greedy entrepreneurial geek who makes a fortune running science fiction conventions for his sad, nerdy friends but gets into blogging and dies of a heart attack at 25.

Small Victories

The last couple of comments on John Scalzi’s post about the Hugo ebook giveaway have been from people who have just bought Supporting Memberships solely so that they could get the books and vote. Here’s hoping that we get a whole bunch more of them. Of course any moment now Kevin is going to email me to tell me that people on SMOFs are demanding that Supporting Members be stripped of their voting rights to stop this sort of thing happening in the future. Can’t have people who are “not part of our community” voting now, can we? I mean, good grief, some of them might be science fiction fans, and that would never do. Thankfully there are way too many sensible people around for these sorts of ideas to have much influence any more.

A Brazilian on Brasyl

One of the things that always worries authors (and reviewers) is setting a book in a far away place and then discovering you got it all wrong. It is worrying for the author, because he may end up offending a lot of people, and it is worrying for the reviewer because she can’t tell if the author has done a superb job or is going to end up with egg on his face. Emerald City closed before I got to read Brasyl, but had I written a review I would have made worried noises about how the book would be received in a country that I know has a love of science fiction. Well, I need worry no longer. Thanks to the magic of Facebook, I now have a friend in Brazil, and he loved the book. Money shot:

Through three main characters, both believable an empathic, McDonald explores the nature of Brazilian people. Even if he hasn’t lived in Brazil, doing his research in a couple of visits to São Paulo, Bahia and the Amazon, and reading the few books about Brazil available in English, McDonald was able to capture, with amazing precision, the Brazilian spirit. And he did this without clichés, without hullabaloos, but with critical observations regarding the importance Brazilian people gives to beauty, soccer and TV. Besides, geographically everything is right and linguistically, it is better than most foreigners trying the language of Camões.

I note also this this is the only review of Brasyl I have read that acknowledges the fact that the hero of one of the three strands, Edson Jesus Oliveira de Freitas, is both bisexual and a transvestite. Gary Wolfe noted one of them. Everyone else has either been blind to this or has chosen to ignore it.

Anyway, congratulations to Ian, Hugo voters please take note, and a small raspberry to the Clarke Jury.

More Awards?

It was pointed out to be while I was at ICFA that Emerald City is listed as a candidate for “Best Magazine or Fanzine” in this year’s Locus Awards. That’s quite an achievement given that it didn’t manage a single issue in 2007. I spoke to Mark Kelly at the banquet and I hereby absolve him of all blame for this. I am, however, rather amused. Feel free to vote for it if you want. It is a category I know I’ll never win, but I’d like to finish above Ansible.

More importantly, however, you have only a few weeks left to cast your Locus Award ballots. There is no fee to vote, and you don’t have to be a member of any convention. Anyone can vote. Please do so. The ballot is here.

ICFA Wrap

I’ve been working a fair amount today, but I did make time to go to Karen’s paper. Naturally she took the opportunity to talk about the excellent From the Notebooks of Dr. Brain.

The awards banquet went very well. The food was good. I got to sit at the Locus table (thanks Charles!). The awards went very smoothly with no one hogging the podium.

We’ve been running a Match It For Pratchett collection all week. According to Farah we raised $1054.

The BSFA Award results came in just before the banquet. Farah spent the pre-banquet reception going around the usual suspects asking us to keep them secret because she wanted to announce Brian Aldiss’s win. It worked. The expression on Brian’s face when Farah made the announcement was priceless.

As the con is now over, we’ve all been working hard on getting drunk and the conversation has deteriorated accordingly. As this is a family blog I’m not saying any more, except to note that I declared a BASFA Meeting and Greg Frost owes me double pun tax (we don’t actually have a special rule for toilet-related puns, but don’t tell Greg that).

I’ll still be around tomorrow because it was cheaper to stay another night than pay the Sunday air fare. Also I haven’t seen a ‘gator yet.

Philip K Dick Award

The PKD is one of my favorite awards. Not only does its juries generally produce very good results, it also, thanks to its focus on paperback-only publication, manages to highlight very deserving works that never get a sniff of the major awards.

So yes, I’m delighted that Nova Swing won. As you probably know, M John Harrison is one of my favorite writers. I loved Light, and if I’m slightly less enthusiastic about Nova Swing that is probably only because I still have a strong geek streak that is always yearning for the next sensawunda experience. I’m also delighted that the courage my pal Juliet Ulman had in bringing Mike’s work to a US audience when older, supposedly wiser editors said he’d never sell here is apparently paying off.

However, what really pleases me about last night’s results is the Special Citation (i.e. second place) for Minister Faust. From the Notebooks of Dr. Brain didn’t make my Hugo short list, but it would absolutely be in my top ten of 2007 SF, and possibly even the top 5 if I had time to sit down and think about the selection. Karen Burnham and I have been plugging the book enthusiastically for some time and have generally got a pretty negative reaction from the rest of the critic community, in no small part because some of them can’t get past the cover. But it is a very fine book. Here’s Karen’s review.

The Raw Shark Texts

I’m not entirely sure what to say about this one other than that I firmly believe that the world needs books about conceptual sharks. They are a clear and present danger to our well-being, and the lack of government attention to this urgent problem is nothing less than shameful.

Also, of all the Clarke nominees I have read, this one is my favorite. The jury, of course, may disagree, but I do hope that it wins (and that Steven Hall gets to write his Doctor Who episode). A big “hurrah” for Canongate for publishing such an adventurous book.