A Trip to Manchester

Yesterday afternoon I headed up to Manchester, and in the evening gave a talk to the local trans group. Manchester has a very well-organized and active LGBT community. It is a very inclusive group as well, as far as I can see. The city is the host to the annual Sparkle festival, the UK’s national trans festival. And the organization I went to see, the Trans Resource and Empowerment Centre, has space in the Lesbian & Gay Foundation‘s offices in the city center.

As befits an organization whose name abbreviates to TREC, the Manchester folks took kindly to a talk about science fiction. I was made extremely welcome, and even the folks there who said they didn’t read SF were very polite about the talk. Afterwards we went off to a nearby pub called, rather appropriately, The Molly House, where I discovered lots of beers I’d never heard of before.

Anyone from Manchester looking for the list of books mentioned, you can find it here. I also added the following:

The Schrödinger’s Cat trilogy by Robert Anton Wilson.

The Drowning Girl by Caitlín R. Kiernan.

Also if the lady who asked about Marxist SF writers should happen to drop by, I recommend China Miéville, Ken MacLeod and Kim Stanley Robinson.

This morning I did a quick tour around the city center taking photos. They turned out to be mainly graffiti, statuary and trains.

[shashin type=”album” id=”53″ size=”medium”]

Lies, Damned Lies and Bishops

Over the past couple of the weeks the UK’s bishops, both Anglican and Catholic, have been bleatingly mightily about the government’s plans to legalize same-sex marriages. Apparently letting a gay or lesbian couple get married is an abomination on a par with abortion and slavery. And what’s more, churches will be forced to perform these marriages, even though they find them morally abhorrent.

Well, actually, no.

The government’s proposals, issued today, make it quite clear that the change in the law will apply only to marriages conducted by civil authorities in registry offices. It will still be illegal for same-sex couples to marry in church. That’s stated clearly by Home Secretary Theresa May here, and by Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone here. And it is set out clearly in the government’s consultation paper here (PDF).

I find it very hard to believe that the bishops did not know that they would be offered this protection. Why would the government not have told them that they were doing this? It has to be a piece of horse trading. And yet the bishops have publicly argued that the government’s plans were exactly the opposite.

Worse still, as this provision is only in there as a sop to the bishops (large portions of their congregations, and even many of their clergy, seem perfectly happy with same-sex marriages), look at the effects. In order to justify their own bigotry, the bishops have persuaded the government to ban all religious organizations from conducting same-sex marriages, whether they approve of them or not. As the Pink News article linked to above notes, many religions, including Quakers, Unitarians, Liberal Judaism and Reform Judaism, want to be able to solemnize same-sex marriages, and will continue to be prevented from doing so. Where exactly is the “tyranny of tolerance” in all this?

There are other issues to be resolved as well. For example, the government expects that same-sex couples who previously enacted civil partnerships will want to convert their relationship to a marriage. There will be opposite-sex couples who would prefer to have a civil partnership, which the government does not propose to allow. Hence the need for a consultation period to work out what provisions need to be enacted.

Crucially from my point of view, there should be recompense for couples in which one partner has undergone gender transition. Because of the bishops’ insistence that same-sex marriages are abhorrent, the Gender Recognition Act stipulates that anyone wishing to change gender must end any existing marriage and, if desired, enter into a civil partnership with their former spouse. The government proposals state that this will no longer be necessary, but they offer no recompense to people whose marriages were forcibly dissolved. If they want to be married again, they will have to pay to convert their civil partnership to a marriage. The number of couples involved is not that large, and this seems to me unnecessarily cruel.

It is worth noting that the final legislation will not necessarily reflect the provisions set out in the consultation. We (British citizens) can change things for the better. Equally the bishops and their allies will be clamoring for the provisions to be watered down. Sadly I expect S’onewall to be whispering in the government’s ear that it will be OK to offer a further sop to the bishops by removing the sections relating to trans people. It won’t be the first time that they have presented themselves to government as legitimate representatives of Britain’s trans population while at the same time promoting transphobia within their own ranks.

Further information, including a link to an online response form, is available from the Home Office here. It is important that as many people as possible do respond, because the bishops will be mounting an aggressive campaign to get their side to respond. In particular it is important that non-trans people support the rights of trans people. The trans community itself is so small that if only trans people speak for it their arguments will seem insignificant.

There are some useful ideas for things to say in the consultation here.

Finally I should note that this really is a problem of bishops, not of Christians. I have many Christian friends, including a Catholic Priest, a Methodist Minister and an Anglican Curate. Large numbers of Christians are perfectly OK with LGBT people. Their leaders refuse to accept this, and are doing untold damage to their faith thereby. I wish God would hurry up and drop a clue stick on some of them.

Wellington, I Love You!

So, were any of my NZ pals involved in this?

If any of you are wondering why Ms. Greer deserves glitter-bombing, Pink News and Diva explain.

The comments about how trans women would all change their minds if they were required to have ovaries and a uterus show how little Greer understands about what she is talking about. As was pointed out on Twitter earlier today, one of the first people to undergo male-to-female surgery opted to try a uterus transplant. The transplant didn’t take and she died. No one risks it these days, but it is still the holy grail of MtF surgery.

Shouty Linkage

Many of you will probably have seen these two things already as they have been all over Twitter, but for those of you who are tweet-free here’s what you missed.

One of the things that came out of International Women’s Day was a Twitter meme in which women recounted tales of casual sexism to which they had been subjected. So much material came in that Linda Grant, who accidentally started the meme, has collected the most egregious examples. There’s more information about it in an article she wrote for The Guardian yesterday.

I managed to miss the whole thing, but had I not done so the example I would have given was one evening when Kevin and I had gone out for dinner in Mountain View (one of the small towns in Silicon Valley). When the bill came I gave the waiter my credit card, which had my name on it. When he came back with the chit to be signed he gave it (and the card) to Kevin.

The other Twitter meme of note from the last few days is #ididntreport, in which women talk about sexual assaults to which they have been subjected, and which they have not reported as crimes for various reasons (including because the assault was either perpetrated by or watched by a policeman). Naturally this meme was immediately invaded by idiot trolls claiming that women deserve to be raped.

Thankfully, beyond the inevitable abuse from young men in cars (because in order to get up the courage to shout at women, men have to be in a group and able to get away quickly), I have nothing to report. I can’t say what I’d do if I did, but probably I’d say nothing. As a trans person you always have to weigh up the risks of interacting with the authorities, the end result of which can often be far worse than the thing you wanted to complain about. UK police forces do now have specialist LGBT units, but I live in a small, rural town and don’t fancy my chances.

Triton Fly-By

On Friday I’ll be giving a talk on trans characters in SF&F to a trans group in Manchester. It will be pretty much the same as the one I gave in Bristol, but I’ve been thinking quite a bit about Samuel Delany’s Triton and I’d like to know what other people made of it. Inevitably this post is spoilery, hence the fold.
Continue reading

Leading Ladies

Ian Sales has an interesting project on his blog today. He’s putting together a list of SF books that are told exclusively from the point of view of female protagonists. There are actually quite a lot, and pleasingly a few by male writers. If you are looking for reading ideas, click here and see what’s available.

The Source of the Problem

This morning Tansy Rayner Roberts tweeted a link to this post by Stuffed Olive which neatly encapsulates the source of the problem with regard to the invisibility of women writers.

A brief re-cap. One of the main reasons, if not the main reason, why women writers are less successful than male ones is that while women readers are happy to read books by and about both men and women, many male readers only read books by and about men. There’s plenty of evidence to support this. I’m starting to regard people who continue to dispute it with the same disdain I reserve for Creationists.

So, why does it happen. Stuffed Olive reports a conversation with a teacher of English:

The English study texts at her own school, she informed me, are almost all centred around male characters. Except for one book about growing up under Islam, all the protagonists are male. Many of the texts are only about boys and men, for example The Road by Cormac McCarthy, and Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, while others possess only secondary female characters, the majority of whom are depicted as in need of protection by the male protagonists.

This is in Victoria, and there’s no national curriculum in Australia, so individual schools can, to some extent, set their own policy. Other parts of the world may be different. But I’ve already heard from Janet Edwards in the UK who said, “Every book we studied at school was either exclusively male or had a female minor character for comedy.” She added later that she went to an all-girls school.

So there’s your problem. If, as children, we are taught that the books we should be reading are by men, and about men, then it is only to be expected that boys will grow up thinking that they only need to read such books. Girls will read books about women too, because they want characters that they can identify with, but they’ll continue to read what they have been taught is the “good stuff”.

Clearly not all school curricula will be this bad, but I’m pretty sure that many are. And until we can fix this problem I don’t think that the issue of gendered reading habits will go away.

Feedback would be welcomed, especially from people who have been through school recently, or who are involved with setting school/examination reading lists in any way.

A Day in Tiger Bay

In days past the area around the docks was one of the least salubrious parts of a city. It had homes for the impoverished dock workers and immigrants fresh off the boats; it had the inevitable red light district. Most coastal cities had a place like this. These days, however, what few docks there are take the form of highly mechanized container ports. The majority of cities have identified the old dockyard region as a valuable piece of seafront real estate that can be transformed into an urban entertainment complex.

My grandfather’s ship was based out of Cardiff, so he must have spent a fair amount of time at the docks. However, he died long before I was born, and when I was a kid Tiger Bay was known only as a bad part of town, and the home of the most famous Welshwoman of the time, the divine Shirley Bassey. That’s all changed. With devolution came money, renewed civic pride, and a need for impressive new national buildings. Thus Tiger Bay became Cardiff Bay, the location of the National Assembly building and so much more. I have never liked the re-naming, but I must say that the place does look rather nice these days.

I was there yesterday for the opening of a Welsh LGBT History exhibition staged by the fine folks from the LGBT Excellence Centre. I won’t say much about the exhibition itself, because my colleagues and I at Out Stories Bristol are planning a similar event for next year and they’ve asked me not to give my views on the Cardiff exhibition until they have had a chance to look at it. I can, however, comment on the event itself, and the location.

The exhibition is in the Pierhead Building, a delightfully crazy piece of Victorian extravagance that is now a small museum of Welsh identity. The photos below show details of the building and some of the non-LGBT elements on display. If you are interested in learning more about the ancient legal code of Wales, the BBC has an interesting post here.

Special guests for the day were Sarah, Fox, Karen and Donna from the My Transsexual Summer TV series. I’m delighted to report that they are all just as nice in person as they seemed on screen. They have also grown into magnificent ambassadors for the trans community and I’m proud to have met them. They gave an excellent interview and Q&A session.

The other main event for the day was a performance of Not About Heroes, a two-person play by Stephen McDonald detailing the relationship between the WWI poets, Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen. It was a very powerful piece, and got me thinking a lot about the very different war I have been writing about. There may be a separate blog post about this at some point if I think I can do it justice.

I also spent a bit for time wandering around the Bay taking photos. It is a very science fictional location. The BBC Wales studios, where Doctor Who is filmed, are not far away, and parts of Mermaid Quay have been used for sets in Torchwood. Indeed, one of the main sites of interest at the Quay is the Torchwood HQ and associated shrine to Ianto Jones. That’s quite a memorial for a fictional character. The location also memorializes Cardiff’s most well-known contributor to the arts of speculative fiction, Roald Dahl.

One of the things that impressed me most about the day was the multicultural nature of the event, and of the city. LGBTEC is a thoroughly diverse organization. The event was chaired by Federico Podeschi, who sounds quite Welsh despite his name. I met a PoC trans woman who was born in the Sudan. There were also people with clear connections to the Spanish-speaking world. Dahl, of course, was the child of Norwegian immigrants. The church that the Norwegians built for themselves can still be seen across the Bay. And on Mermaid Quay there is a statue of a young couple enjoying the view. The young man looks like he might be a dock worker with a lengthy local ancestry. His partner looks like her family came to Cardiff via the Caribbean or Africa. But the title of the sculpture is “People Like Us”. It is a very conscious statement of the multicultural nature of modern Welsh society.

Here are the photos. There are three pages of them, so single-click on the picture and then keep clicking “next”.

[shashin type=”album” id=”52″ size=”medium”]

Invisibility Watch

It being International Women’s Day (and before anyone whines, International Men’s Day does exist — it is in November), here’s a brief visibility update.

Most of you will probably have seen VIDA’s report on the visibility (or lack thereof) of women in mainstream literary magazines during 2011. What you may not have seen is this post which looks at books reviewed in popular SF&F blogs.

There’s certainly potential for selection bias here, and the sample size is quite small, so I’m not going to claim that this proves anything. It is, however, yet another data point. And to my mind the key statistic is this: 41% of books reviewed by women bloggers were by male authors; only 18% of the books reviewed by male bloggers were by female authors.

I note that my review selections of late have been very deliberately slanted in favor of female authors.

Women in SF: Chicken or Egg?

The UK has an excellent resource for women writers called Mslexia. It is always full of interesting advice for writers. Up until recently it is has been pretty crap as far as SF&F is concerned, but even that has changed. I saw my friend Juliet McKenna in there a while back, and they have Rhian Bowley blogging for them on SF&F issues now.

Why do I mention this now? Well last year the featured topic for their writing competition was “In the year 2212”. I sent something off to make sure that they got a decent level of response. I had no expectations of getting it published — you all know how crap my fiction is — but I figured that it was important that they knew people were interested.

Well, the rejection letter arrived today, and right up front it says, “We were disappointed that our postbag was so lean for this topic…”

*headdesk*

What can you do? Mslexia has concluded, “it seems women are less interested in this subject matter then in other themes.” Maybe they are right. Maybe women writers in the UK know how little chance they have of getting published writing SF so they don’t bother, even in women-only spaces. Either way, the end result will be that Mslexia will be discouraged about doing SF-related features in future, and the lack of them will discourage their readers from being interested in SF. It’s a feedback system, locked into a downward spiral. I wish I knew how to break out of it.

A Fresh Volley

My friends at Trans Media Watch should be back in front of the Leveson Inquiry on media ethics soon with a new submission. As I have noted over the past few days, ever since TMW first gave evidence, the tabloid press has ramped up its campaign of harassment against trans people. As Pink News reports, in the fortnight since the Leveson appearance, 34 articles on trans people have been published in the British press, 14 of them in the Daily Malice and its subsidiaries. They are almost entirely hostile (using terms like “freakish” and “revolting”). Some follow the practice of presenting an article as an interview when in fact they just stole quotes from other online sources. And some are almost laughably inaccurate. According to one Malice article, trans people didn’t exist 20 years ago. Well it is good to know that I can’t be any older than 20.

A rather better account of trans history, in this case black trans history, can be found in this fine article by Monica Roberts in Ebony. The first known African American trans person was born in 1886.

Meanwhile the Huffington Post has asked someone who actually works with trans kids to counter some of the lies and distortions being spread by the tabloids. It is an excellent piece, and in particular shows clearly how, under the excuse of providing “balance”, the media privilege the views of people with loud opinions but no actual knowledge above those who work in the area in question.

The Truth About The Gender Industry

Yesterday’s Daily Malice contained a lengthy article purporting to expose the evils of Britain’s “Gender Industry”. Unfortunately, as is common for the Malice, their journalists knew very little about the subject and got much of it wrong. In particular they fingered the Portman and Tavistock Clinics as leaders of this industry, when in trans communities this organization is known as deeply conservative and often acting in ways directly opposed to the interests of trans people. For an example, in 2002 a group of their staff wrote to the Daily Telegraph as follows:

The recent judgment in the European Court of Human Rights, in which a post-operative transsexual person was granted permission to marry in his adopted gender role, is a victory of fantasy over reality.

If there is someone that these people deem worthy of treatment, you can bet that the case is very clear cut.

The reality of care for trans people is very different. There are probably a few surgeons who make good money, though I’m guessing less than they could get in more glamorous specializations. Organizations that care for trans people are often heavily dependent on charity, which in turn relies on actual trans people for donations, and they are chronically underemployed. Medical professionals are constantly at risk of being hit with malpractice suits from conservative colleagues should they be deemed guilty of treating trans people with compassion and respect.

Of course the British people, and indeed concerned persons all around the world, do need to know more about this clandestine and hugely profitable gender industry. I have therefore taken it upon myself to indulge in a little investigative journalism. Here is the awful truth of how cunning trans people have made fortunes by replacing “real” men and women with “fakes” in work that does not conform to traditional gender stereotypes.

One of the first gender entrepreneurs in the UK was Roz Kaveney. A struggling journalist and aspiring writer, Kaveney was introduced by her friend, Neil Gaiman, to an equally ambitious American screenwriter called Joss Whedon. Whedon had a plan to create a TV series based around the cult movie, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. However, he was unable to persuade any Hollywood actresses to star in the series. They felt that taking the role of a kick-ass, vampire-killing heroine would be damaging to their public images, and to their long-term careers. Whedon therefore asked Kaveney to supply a group of trans women to act in the series.

When Buffy became a surprise hit, Kaveney was suddenly in great demand in Hollywood. Every studio wanted a similar series, and Kaveney’s company, Trans R Us, was the leading supplier of suitable actresses. Kaveney’s products later went on to star in TV series such as Alias, and in movies such as the Underworld and Resident Evil series.

Her commercial success allowed Kaveney to return to her first love, writing. Realizing that no self-respecting “real” woman would write romance novels featuring kick-ass, monster-killing heroines, she began to write novels featuring characters similar to Buffy. The idea took off, and soon Kaveney found books by her pen names, including Laurell K. Hamilton, Carrie Vaughn and Kim Harrison were becoming best-sellers. Pretty much all of the early output of the paranormal romance and urban fantasy genres was penned by Kaveney herself. However, despite her success, women writers were willing to follow her example for fear of a public backlash, or being blacklisted by published who deemed their work insufficiently feminine. Unable to find suitable talent within the trans community, Kaveney hired a number of male ghost writers to write her books for her. Successful authors such as Tim Pratt, Daniel Abrahams, Ian McDonald, Sean Williams and John Scalzi all got their start ghost writing for Kaveney.

Although Kaveney is believed to be the first British trans woman to become a millionaire through her business interests, her wealth and fame is far eclipsed by that of the health industry mogul, Christine Burns. Around 2004 the Blair government began to run into problems recruiting staff for the National Health Service. Their program of gender equality in education had been so successful that all young women studying medicine now wanted to be doctors rather than nurses. Unfortunately a high profile study by the Royal College of Psychiatry had proved conclusively that male hospital patients are unlikely to recover successfully unless they have pretty young women to look after them. The shortage of female nurses looked set to result in a major health crisis.

Some of the shortage was made up through immigration, but Burns approached the government with the idea of transforming aspiring young male nurses into women. The idea proved very effective in solving the nurse shortage, and Burns was awarded an MBE for her services to the NHS. Indeed, so successful has she become that other companies in the UK health sector poured millions of pounds into Conservative Party coffers in the hope that they could win an election and put a stop to Burns. The NHS reforms championed by Andrew Lansley are the end result of this campaign. NHS staff, many of whom owe their jobs to Burns, are vociferously opposing the reforms. It remains to be seen whether Burns’ commercial empire will survive the assault.

Gender entrepreneurs have been successful in many other walks of British life. For example, the entertainment industry has long held that women simply aren’t funny. In any case, feminists have no sense of humor so there would be no sense in catering to them by providing women comedians. However, the general trend in society towards equal rights did require at least a semblance of balance. As a consequence, Bethany Black has built a substantial business out of supplying trans women comics, including Ellen De Generes, French & Saunders, and Jo Brand. You didn’t think they could be that funny if they were “real” women, did you, people?

The gender industry has been much slower on the uptake when it came to trans men, but one notable business has been built in sports. Back in 2006, Delia Smith was worried about the poor performance of her Norwich City football club. An internal enquiry had identified that a major problem was the team’s yellow shirts. They were deemed “too girly”, and as a consequence top flight players were unwilling to join the club. The enquiry recommended a change of strip, but Smith is a committed traditionalist who was unwilling to abandon not only the club’s colors, but also their nickname of The Canaries. Even the club badge would have to be changed. She turned instead to gender entrepreneur, Juliet Jacques, herself a life-long Norwich fan, and asked her if she could turn top quality female players into men.

The project took a long time to bear fruit. Amongst the teething problems was the fact that large doses of testosterone made trans men prone to fits of anger and violence. Some early models such as Robbie Savage and Joey Barton have become notorious for their poor disciplinary records. Eventually, however, the years of research paid off and Norwich is once again back near the top of the Premiership.

Meanwhile, determined to make the best of her initial failures, Jacques tried selling some of her early models to rugby clubs. This proved ideal, and although rugby is a much less wealthy sport it provided a healthy income for Jacques and her company. At one point she supplied the entire squad of the top Parisian team, Stade Français. This deal came to an end thanks to events in Italy.

In 2010 a newspaper owned by a rival media company exposed the fact that all of the prostitutes at one of Prime Minister Berlusconi’s famous orgies were actually trans women supplied by wealthy Italian gender entrepreneur, Vladimir Luxuria. As part of the fall-out from this, it was revealed that the Italian rugby captain, Sergio Parisse, a Stade Français player, was actually a trans man. The scandal spread back to France, and the Parisian club ended their deal with Jacques. The team has languished in the lower reaches of the French league ever since.

The gender industry is by no means confined to Europe. Indeed, it is currently playing a major role in US Politics. Back in 1998, Newt Gingrich was scouring Hollywood for a rugged, right-wing actor who could be groomed to be the next Ronald Reagan. Arnold Schwarzenegger was ineligible due to being foreign-born, and Gingrich found the majority of male Hollywood stars — people like Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio — to be a bunch of effeminate metrosexuals entirely unsuited for political office. Then he met up with gender entrepreneur, Calpernia Addams, and American politics changed forever.

The project was put on a back burner during the Shrub Presidency, and when it was revived early attempts to produce potential female candidates from right-wing males proved disastrous. The subjects were unable to successfully integrate their new female identities with the level of misogyny required of them. Projects such as Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann were notable failures. However, Addams then came up with a new idea. Combining the successful work of Juliet Jacques on trans men with the assistance of top quality Hollywood cosmetic surgeons and make-up artists, she began to develop a series of trans male replicants. These could take the place of under-performing Republican politicians and push the party line that Gingrich wanted. Products such as Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum have proved very successful with Republican voters in recent months.

Unusually Gingrich, who had tired of the hurly-burly of political life, also opted to have himself replaced by a replicant. His new career as mild-mannered investment consultant, “Bernie Madoff”, went very well until his business ran into trouble during the recent financial crisis. The real Gingrich has therefore been forced to watch from jail as his trans replicant hits the presidential campaign trail.

The hot young talent in the gender industry is Paris Lees. Tall and slender herself, Lees quickly realized that the standard shape for catwalk models doesn’t work for women. They simply don’t have, well, shape. So Lees began a modelling agency for trans women. Her initial products, Lea T and Andrej Pejić, have been hugely successful. Given Lees’ energy and business acumen, it seems likely that she’ll be the major supplier of catwalk models for years to come.

There have long been rumors in fandom that I am fantastically wealthy, and I can now reveal that much of my income has come from a burgeoning business in gender derivatives. The idea is deceptively simple. Rich couples are able to take out an option on the gender of future children. If a pregnancy turns out to be for a child different from what they wanted, the option pays out and they can afford gender reassignment surgery. Some of my customers have instead opted to have the unwanted child adopted, and to choose a new child of their own. This has led me to become close friends with prominent people in the celebrity adoption industry such as Madonna and Angelina Jolie. Many of my best clients come from European royal families. Indeed, Kevin and I will be attending the Monaco Grand Prix in style this year. Look out for us in the Royal Box during the trophy presentation.

Thanks to my interests in the gender industry, I am now financially secure and able to indulge in a little philanthropy. I have decided to help out the campaign for gender equality in the science fiction and fantasy community. It is well known that no “real” man would ever give up his place on a panel in favor of a woman. However, by licensing the trans replicant technology from Calpernia Addams, and severely toning down the testosterone doses, my staff have managed to create a range of male writer replicants with an interest in gender equality. As you might have guessed, one of our first products is Paul Cornell.

Unfortunately the real Paul Cornell didn’t take kindly to being replaced. He has converted to Catholicism and is currently studying at a remote monastery in the Calabrian Mountains in Southern Italy. He is a member of a new militant order of Catholic monks founded by Pope Ratty and financed by Berlusconi and prominent Mafia leaders. Penis Dei is devoted to saving the world from the Transgender Menace by hunting down trans people and selling their stories to British tabloid newspapers. Their headquarters are believed to be in Ireland, where they disguise themselves as mild-mannered, fun-loving bookmakers.

I would like to thank Julie Bindel and her tireless colleagues at the pressure group, Trans Empire Watch, for their help in preparing this article.

The management accepts that certain details presented in this article may be somewhat less than entirely factual, but they have been retained for artistic effect. We assert that the Truthiness quotient of this article is no less than that of some articles about trans people published by the Daily Malice. Furthermore we assert that, in the world of the UK’s tabloid newspapers, the concept of “truth” is entirely fungible and often used to indicate that the material in question is entirely made up.

And Another Thing: Attention Pagans

Overnight I was mailed a link to this post which details a current controversy in the Pagan community, specifically PantheaCon which, rather bravely, attempts to bring Pagans of all faiths together.

As some of you may know, especially if you have read Neil Gaiman’s A Game of You, there is a tendency towards transphobia in certain parts of the Pagan community. That, I am fairly certain, has links to the radical separatism of the 1970s, a period during which hatred for trans women was common amongst feminists. Certainly the language used by Z Budapest is very reminiscent of Raymond et al. And if you are setting up a female separatist community, and are religious, adopting a female goddess is entirely appropriate. But…

It saddens me that so many people of religious persuasion (not just Pagans) appear to be so wedded to the idea of biological essentialism and incapable of considering the existence of souls that may not match the bodies that they inhabit. Also, Liz Hand’s wonderful Waking the Moon contains food for thought. (It is a while since I read it, but I noticed on Twitter that Roz was re-reading it with joy yesterday.)

Anyway, if you are of a Pagan persuasion you may want to pop over there and consider what is being said. (Warning, it is long and quotes some fairly strong anti-trans language.)

And yes, I am aware of the issues surrounding a petition being raised by a Discordian. Sometimes organizations need a little chaos to disrupt their fossilized thinking.

Casualty Report

The first reports of casualties are starting to come in from the front. This morning a friend of mine was staying in a London hotel. At breakfast some of the staff started pointing her out, and one then came over and loudly asked if she had been in the Paddy Power ad. Other diners took note, and two business people at an adjacent table loudly demanded that they be moved so that they didn’t have to sit near her.

The good news is that the hotel management was furious. My friend had her bill cancelled and was offered 7 free night stays. The staff involved got a serious talking to. I gather the manager used the words “police” and “hate crime” to emphasize just how serious the matter was.

Sadly the hotel isn’t able to do anything about the other guests. I’d love to know who those two business people were, and why they thought that their behavior was in any way appropriate.

In this particular case the lady concerned was trans, but she’s also at that time of life when all of us who don’t have Joan Collins type fortunes start to lose our good looks. It is entirely possible that cis women will get the same sort of treatment.

Trans journalist Jane Fae covered the story this morning. She also mentioned another story in which a trans woman was cut up and rammed on the M25. The perp sped off quickly, but before he did he wound down the window and yelled, “Are you a fucking man or a woman?”

The good news is that the other side is also suffering casualties. Specifically, ClearCast, the regulatory body that initially approved the Paddy Power ad., has now reversed their decision. This means that the ad. can no longer be shown on UK television. So it sounds like my cricket watching has been saved. I did actually mail a letter to Sky early this morning so I’ll wait and see what response I get, but if they are at all professional they’ll manage to word it appropriately.

Of course the war isn’t over. Paddy Power are bleating pathetically on their blog about how they have been unfairly treated. Apparently they think that as long as an ad has more “likes” than “dislikes” on YouTube then it cannot be offensive. I expect outraged articles from the Malice and Sun complaining about how politically correct killjoys are ruining everyone’s right to abuse others. I also expect Paddy Power to post something on YouTube that makes their original ad. look positively trans-friendly by comparison. Still, this is a very significant victory.

There’s just one more thing I would like to add. Today on Gay Times Patrick Strudwick had a wonderful article about why LGB people should support trans folks. I’d like to quote one paragraph from it:

A 2009 study into transphobia across the European Union found that trans people are three times more likely to suffer from abuse than gay people. You might assume this report would depict Britain favourably, that we would come out well for trans folk, that our liberal nation would be a better place to live than, say, Hungary. But no. Trans people are more likely to be physically assaulted in Britain than any other EU country.

Gee, I wonder why that might be? Do you think it might have something to do with Britain having the most vicious tabloid media in Europe?

Update: I understand that the new Paddy Power ad. has indeed been banned before it could air. Apparently it involved threats to shoot people (though not trans people in this case).

Also we’ve got word that the new Sunday Sun will feature an article on “trans regret” which will imply that many trans women come to deeply regret losing their penises.

Exchanging Fire

I have a few quick reports from the battlefront today.

On my own part I have engaged in discussions with Sky, Channel 4 and Cheltenham Racecourse. I have also entered a formal complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority.

The Sky customer service people were duly apologetic and sorry to be losing me. As subscriptions are paid in advance they have a month or so to change their minds and win me back (though I won’t be watching in the meantime, I have had enough of that ad.). The guy I spoke to gave me an address to write to so that I could send the complaint up the chain.

Channel 4 were only able to help me lodge a formal complaint.

The discussion with Cheltenham was interesting. They told me that the whole thing was done without their knowledge or approval. They say that they lack the necessary trademarks to prevent Paddy Power from appearing to speak for them. Nevertheless they seem strangely reluctant to make a public statement dissociating themselves from the Paddy Power stunt.

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the front, Green Party MP Caroline Lucas has opened fire on The Sun. If you are lucky enough to live somewhere that has a sane MP you may be able to ask them to support that motion.

And finally, I received email from Change.org reporting some welcome success in the video games story I mentioned yesterday:

I would just like to let you all know that as of a couple of hours ago, BioWare have released a statement on their forums and their Twitter feed condemning the abuse directed at Jennifer Hepler, and pledging to donate $1000 to Bullying Canada on her behalf.

Which is exactly the sort of thing I am coming to expect from Bioware. They seem to be very good people.

War Bulletin

This is an update on my weekend post about the developing war between the UK media and trans people. As I noted, the tabloids will be looking for people on whom to wreak their revenge. For the past couple of days they have been full of stories about a 5-year-old child who has currently chosen to live as girl despite being assigned male at birth. I know that sounds young, but if I’d been given the same choice at the same age I’d have made the same decision. What’s important is that the kid then gets a chance to get on with her life. Unfortunately her name and photo are all over the papers. She and her parents have already received death threats. The newspaper reports contain sufficient information to find her home.

Meanwhile the Paddy Power story goes from bad to worse. Remember that they claimed to have consulted a “leading UK transgender association” in advance. Well they did. They spoke to the Beaumont Society. That’s an old, established organization that caters mainly to cross-dressers. They do try to help other types of trans people as well, but they are not always very good at it, this being a case in point. And of course the script of the ad changed significantly between between approved by the Beaumont Society and being broadcast. Journalists and advertisers, you can’t trust them an inch.

The good news is that the Advertising Standards Authority has agreed to investigate the ad. This means that complaining will help. You can do so here. The important points to note are: a) that you are not trans (assuming you are not, but it is non-trans people that will get listened to); b) that the main victims at the race day will be cis women who are deemed insufficiently pretty (trans people mostly can’t afford to go to the races); c) that in the meantime making a “sport” out of “tr*nny spotting” is going to lead to innocent trans women all over the UK (and insufficiently pretty cis women as well) being hounded and probably beaten up.

I’m also pleased to report that ESPN has decided to stop showing the ad. That’s remarkably encouraging. Unfortunately Channel 4 and Sky have refused to follow suit. For them the ad revenue is much more important than any harm the ad might cause.

So tomorrow I will be phoning Sky and cancelling my Sky Sports subscription. I’ll make it clear to them that I’ll sign up again if they stop showing the ad and apologize for the distress and danger that they have caused.

The whole mess has been further complicated by the emergency of technology that purports to determine your gender using face recognition technology. A children’s charity called Plan UK is in the news because they’ve come up with a cunning wheeze to highlight discrimination against women by making an ad that can only be seen by women. It will be on display at a bus stop in Oxford Street, London. When you stand in front of it, it will display the ad if it thinks you are female, and will be blank otherwise. There’s a BBC report here.

Of course this is going to catch quite a lot of trans people. If you transitioned late in life, and you couldn’t afford cosmetic surgery, then your features probably won’t be very feminine. But also the technique isn’t very precise. According to the BBC 10% of women will be wrongly identified as men. And yes, you guessed it, they will be women who are insufficiently young and pretty for white male tastes. It isn’t terribly precise either. I found an iPhone app that claims to use the same technology. Results for photos of me range from 18% female to 63% female. So ladies, be careful around bus stops in London in future. Because there might just be some drunk idiot playing the Paddy Power “stop the tr*nny” game who is using such ads as an aid. Your chances of being outed are quite high, regardless of whether you are trans or not.

Oh, and guys, you are not safe either. You know what idiots will say if the ad shows for you.

Finally, while we are on the subject of follow-up, remember my post about video games, in which I talked (mainly in the comment thread) about how I stopped playing them because I could never get past the action sequences? Well it seems to me that if you have a really good story then it would make sense to allow kultzes like me to skip those sections, but apparently if a well-known game designer suggests such a thing then its a crime worthy of a death sentence, and of course a sustained troll attack. More details here.

UK Government OKs Sex Ed. Guide Based on Gor Book

From the department of “you couldn’t make it up”…

In theory the UK has an Equality Act that bans discrimination against people on the grounds of their sexuality. In practice, of course, homophobic organizations (mostly religious) will do anything they can to get around this, and some Tory ministers are only to happy to help them.

As The Guardian reports today, Catholic faith schools in Lancashire have been handing out copies of a booklet called “Pure Manhood: How to become the man God wants you to be”, written by an American fundamentalist preacher. The booklet includes statements like this: “the homosexual act is disordered, much like contraceptive sex between heterosexuals. Both acts are directed against God’s natural purpose for sex – babies and bonding.” It also insists that, “scientifically speaking, safe sex is a joke”.

Trade unionists have complained to the Education Minister, Michael Gove, that the booklet is homophobic and should be banned, but Gove insists that school curriculums are exempt from the Equality Act, and that consequently schools are free to teach any sort of bigoted nonsense they want.

Weird ideas about sex, however, are not the only strange things in the booklet. All sorts of aspects of macho-ness are explored, including the need for real men to kill animals to prove their virility. There is a particularly bizarre passage about how to kill a wolf by sacrificing a goat. I won’t go into the gory details. The important point is that, as this blog post reveals, that piece of text was lifted from the book Beasts of Gor by John Norman.

So, I ask you, would you want your children taught about sex from a booklet written by someone who gets his ideas from Gor novels? Apparently Mr. Gove thinks that’s OK.

Notes from the Battlefront

Earlier this month I blogged about how trans people are becoming far more visible in British society, even appearing as respected political activists on the BBC. The downside of such visibility, of course, is that the minute you poke your head above the parapet you become a target. That has consequences.

Last week the British police arrested a number of prominent News International journalists who work on The Sun on suspicion of bribing both police and government officials. Tweaking the tabloids’ tails is dangerous. One of the main reasons why they have held such sway over British public life for decades is that people are rightly afraid of them. Tabloid journalists can be vicious bullies who can and will exact revenge on people who speak out against them. And if they can’t get at specific individuals they may take their anger out on any vulnerable minority they happen to notice.

There was a certain amount of irony, therefore, that at the same time as complaining bitterly about a “witch hunt” against their staff, The Sun was offering a reward for anyone who could give them the identity of a trans man in the UK who had given birth. Challenged on the issue, The Sun‘s editor claimed that the story was in the public interest because the man concerned might also be a serial killer. Presumably they were also planning a story about how men giving birth was disgusting and perverted, and perhaps demanding that the child be taken into care to prevent it being raised into a life of depravity. However, I understand that the Daily Mail may have beaten them to it on that one.

Meanwhile trans men in Britain have been living in fear of being outed to The Sun by people hoping for a reward. As Jane Fae reports in the post I linked to above:

In a separate development today, a spokeswoman for leading trans action group, Trans Panthers UK revealed how a trans man whose sister had recently given birth was today hounded out of his workplace by fellow workers threatening to “out” him in return for the reward offered by the Sun newspaper.

It is a war. There will be casualties. Some of them will be innocent bystanders.

Of course journalists are not the only people wanting to take advantage of the current notoriety of trans people. Step forward, therefore, Paddy Power. For those of you not based in the UK or Ireland, these people are bookmakers. That means that they are already potentially in the business of exploiting the vulnerable. I understand that gambling is a fun pastime enjoyed by many people. Kevin gets a lot of value out of playing blackjack. And I used to work in a bookmaker’s during vacations when I was at college; I know that there are people who are real experts on horses who quite often do very well as a result. However, I also saw that the bookmakers make their profits from those who are less able: the drunks, the desperate, and those simply not smart enough to figure the odds, but who keep hoping that their luck will turn. Responsible bookmakers know this and take care of their customers, irresponsible ones exploit it.

Paddy Power are no strangers to controversy either. They like being out on the edge as far as their advertising goes. They’ve done some ads poking fun at hipsters with smart phones that I found quite funny. They were also responsible for one of the most complained about ads of 2011, in which a blind footballer is shown mistaking a cat with a bell on its collar for the ball (blind people, apparently, play football using a ball that makes a noise when it moves). The Advertising Standards Authority cleared the ad, and the controversy got a lot of publicity for Paddy Power, a lesson I am sure they took to heart.

This year they have just started running an ad for the Cheltenham Festival, a horse racing event. The idea behind the ad is that on Ladies’ Day punters should play the game of “spot the tr*nny”.

Yes, you did read that right.

My guess is that the main effect of this, as far as Cheltenham is concerned, will be a great deal of harassment of female race-goers at the event itself. There will be plenty of drunk people on the lookout for any woman that they deem insufficiently pretty, or trying overly hard to be glamorous, and accusing them of being “really men”. Women planning to attend Ladies’ Day at Cheltenham this year will need to be prepared to have their breasts prodded by drunken louts asking, “are they real?”

For trans women, of course, the reality will be rather different. Most of them can’t afford to go to the races. They won’t be there to be outed. But in the meantime they will have to live through a time when anyone who watches TV where the Paddy Power ad airs will be encouraged to play “spot the tr*nny”. That, inevitably, will lead to people being abused and chased through the streets, and being beaten up. It may lead to them being hounded out of their jobs and homes. A fairly recent survey found that around 34% of UK trans people have attempted suicide. I confidently predict that number will rise this year.

None of this will affect Paddy Power or the Cheltenham Festival. It won’t be their friends or relatives that are affected. And it is pretty clear from the way that they are going about this that the whole point of the ad campaign is to generate controversy. Cheltenham even posted the ad on their Facebook page with an exhortation to their fans to have their say on whether it is offensive or not. Last I looked the comments thread was full of complaints from trans people, but I suspect that by the end of Monday it will have filled up with the usual sort of comments you get on tabloid newspaper stories about trans people.

So no, Paddy Power and Cheltenham Festival will not suffer. They will happily bask in the column inches that they gain from this, and the extra money that they expect to make as a result.

That, however, is not the end of the story. Challenged on the issue, Paddy Power revealed that they had cast actual trans people in the ad, and that they had, “sought approval for the commercial from a leading UK transgender association”. Note that they did not say that they got approval. Nor is it clear whether the people recruited knew how their appearances would be used. Given that the trans umbrella is fairly broad, it is possible that the people involved are all drag queens and part-time cross dressers who live most of their lives as males. Whatever, it is causing a great deal of finger pointing and recriminations. The point here, however, is that there is money on offer, and when you are trying to victimize members of a despised minority community there will always be someone amongst them desperate enough to take your money.

There’s a war being fought, and the gloves are off. There are no rules.

Positive Discrimination

Over the past few days UK newspapers have been full of stories about how poor Christian people are being evilly discriminated again. There is, the Daily Malice informs us, an Attack on Christianity! The government has sent an envoy to Rome to ask for help. Something must be done.

If you have been paying attention, you will know that what is actually happening is that Christians are being told that they are subject to the law of the land just like everyone else. You don’t get a “get out of equality law free” card by just waving a crucifix around. That can be hard to accept if you are used to wallowing in privilege, but the way things go in a multi-cultural society is that each group of people has the same rights as every other group. If one group, for historical reasons, has enjoyed special rights, unwinding that is not “positive discrimination”, it is just making everyone equal.

Of course, as portraying yourself as a victim is the most successful political tactic in this Internet age, lots of people are going round yelling about how they are being discriminated against, and not just the Christians.

Yesterday a well known Christian, Mr. Paul Cornell, caused a major stir by saying that he was no longer prepared to participate on convention panels that did not have some degree of gender balance (he’s looking for 2 out of 5, or 3 out of 6, women). It is a personal decision of his, apparently inspired by a similar act of principle by China Mièville at the recent SFX Weekender. Nevertheless, Paul is being accused of “positive discrimination”.

At this point, dear readers, you might want to get out your violins and handkerchiefs, so you can be properly sorry for those horribly oppressed male fanboys.

Positive discrimination? Why of course! Some poor, innocent male who was expecting to enjoy an all-male panel featuring Mr. Cornell and several other (probably straight, white, middle class) men will find himself having to look at, and perhaps even listen to, a woman. Oh noes! The poor fellow may catch Girl Cooties! Look, he’s having an attack of the vapors at the mere thought. Sad panda face, everyone, please.

Hopefully, now we are all pre-warned, we can avoid going to any panels with Mr. Cornell on them. Wise conventions will, of course, decline to use him as a panelist, so as not to risk exposing their attendees to unwelcome surprises. But what if they don’t? What if they actually start asking women to be on panels? As all right-thinking fanboys know, when you are putting a panel together it is important to pick the right men for the job. And the right men, are, pretty obviously, men. Look, if women had anything interesting to say, surely they’d be on panels already. The fact that they are so rare proves just how stupid and irrelevant they are, right?

Where might it all end? If women are allowed onto panels, whatever will we see next? People with brown faces? Gays? People like me? Oh dear, the poor fellow’s having an attack of the vapors again.

Equally, of course, we have the other side of the argument. It is not enough that Paul should take this pledge on his own behalf. All other male authors must sign up to it as well. All conventions must guarantee gender parity on all panels, otherwise we should boycott them! And this, of course, is no more helpful than our fainty, fanboy friend. Indeed, if there is some sort of fannish campaign to demand gender parity on all convention panels, all the time, then I shall be rather annoyed, and lots of people who used to give their time running programming for conventions will start to drift away. Real life is not black and white. Here’s how it really works.

Conventions come in all shapes and sizes. Some, I guess, might want to be all testosterone, all the time. Good luck to them. But most want to attract lots of members, and as half of the population happens to be female it makes sense to make them feel welcome and wanted in some way. Also, good program designers know that having a variety of different people on panel tends to make for interesting discussion. Often you don’t know a lot about some of the people who volunteer for panels, and getting gender balance is a useful way to choose between them. Smart programming people, then, will want to put women on panels. But getting that done can be hard.

To start with there are some panels where the participants pick themselves. If you are running a comics convention, and you have Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons in attendance, you might want to try to get them to do a panel about Watchmen. If you are running a Doctor Who convention you might have a panel about playing the Doctor with panelists who have actually done it (and no Joanna Lumley on your guest list). Equally if you are planning a panel about lesbianism in fantasy you may well end up with an all-female panel. Having a 50/50 rule for all panels just constrains the type of panels you can put on.

Also the darn women make it difficult. They’ve mostly been socialized from childhood to be shy and retiring, and some of them still don’t like putting themselves forward. You are proposing a panel on archaeology in fantasy. A bunch of men who have seen one or two episodes of Time Team and fancy themselves as Indiana Jones volunteer immediately. The woman with a degree in archaeology quietly excuses herself with a comment about not being sufficiently qualified for such a panel. They need encouragement and cajoling. Call that “positive discrimination” if you like, but it is also a case of picking the right person for the job.

Then there’s the problem of audiences. Just as many men seem unwilling to read a book by a woman, so many men are likely to avoid program items that have all-woman panels. The way to avoid this, however, is to have mixed panels. If there really are men who won’t go to a panel that has a woman on it then I feel rather sad for them. Most men appear to be much more reasonable.

Of course audiences do like to see the big stars, and if the publishing industry doesn’t have gender balance then you might wonder whether popular panels should be all men. Certainly if you ask major publishers who to put on panel the chances are that they will push their male writers first. But you don’t really want to have all of the big names on the same panel. You want to spread the attraction around so as to get good crowds to all of your panels. Paul Cornell might be a big draw (except now to gynophobic fanboys), but you don’t want him on every panel, and he won’t want to do all of them.

So convention programming is a complicated business. You want to have interesting and varied panels. You want to mix potentially interesting alternative views with big names. You want to drag intelligent women, shy and retiring though they may be, onto panels. But there will always be some panels where it makes sense to have them mono-gendered, and you’ll always be fighting a whole bunch of other issues, including getting people scheduled. Sometimes a panel participant will call in sick on the day, and wreck your plans. Despite this, most conventions that I go to manage reasonably well. Looking through last year’s BristolCon program, we had only one multi-person panel that didn’t have a woman on it. We weren’t 50/50, but if (ahem) we’d known in advance that Tricia Sullivan and Freda Warrington were going to turn up we would have done better. I’m partially to blame myself as well, having only volunteered for one program item.

What Paul is mainly concerned about (and I gather that the SFX Weekender was a prime example of this, though I wasn’t there so I can’t confirm it) are conventions that have plenty of intelligent women in attendance but manage to pack most of their panels with men. I suspect this applies mainly to commercially run operations, because they are much more likely to be mired in an “only boys read SF” mindset. The primary benefit of what Paul has done is that it will get convention programming teams to examine their assumptions. If they put on more interesting panels as a result, all well and good. If they decide not to use Paul on panels so that can have them all-male, that’s their choice.

The important point here is that Paul (and others like him – I understand that Adam Roberts has taken the same pledge, while Charlie Stross has done something similar with regards to anthologies) is doing this as an individual. He’s not forcing conventions to do anything. And I’m sure he’d be willing to talk if someone had a really great programming idea and was having trouble finding women for it. As long these personal decisions don’t evolve into some sort of fandom-wide campaign to pillory any convention that fails to achieve exactly 50/50 on every panel then I don’t see how this can be described as “discrimination” of any sort.

And if someone does still want to call it discrimination, I will happily explain to them what life is like for trans people. Then they might begin to understand what that word really means.