Clever Little Critters

In the UK I’m used to seeing stories about how cunning squirrels manage to defeat every trick humans can come up with and succeed, yet again, in stealing food put out in gardens for birds. But squirrels are cunning in the wild as well, as this US story shows:

California ground squirrels and rock squirrels chew up rattlesnake skin and smear it on their fur to mask their scent from predators, according to a new study by researchers at UC Davis.

Be wary of squirrels, they might be smarter than we are and are just lulling us into a false sense of security by their cute antics.

Galaxy Wars

Astronomers using NASA telescopes have discovered a galaxy that has opened fire on a near neighbor using a deadly jet of energy emanating from a super-massive black hole. Of course none of them have yet come out and admitted that this is clear evidence of a inter-galactic war being waged between two advanced alien civilizations, but we know, don’t we. It does, after all, sound just like something out of one of Robert Reed’s Marrow stories.

Zombie Cockroaches

Yes, really. Nature reports on a paper in the Journal of Experimental Biology that explains how the emerald cockroach wasp enslaves its victim using a neurotoxin, enabling the much smaller wasp to lead the hapless cockroach to its death. Much easier than paralyzing the prey and having to drag it back home yourself, you see. Isn’t science wonderful?

Hey look, fewer cockroaches in the world has to be a good thing, and until such time as politicians work how how to play a similar trick on voters we are safe, right?

Black Hole Caught Eating

You are familiar with the situation, right? A black hole captures an unfortunate star, which ends up in orbit around it. Slowly but surely material from the captured star gets sucked away into an accretion disk around the black hole. Mostly the black hole just sips on this, but every so often, CHOMP! And some lucky astronomers have now seen this in action.

Very spectacular, but perhaps not quite as gruesome as Glenda Larke’s frog-eating post. Don’t go there if you have a delicate stomach or a phobia about snakes.

Beginning of the End?

Today’s Guardian has an article about Cern’s new Large Hadron Collider, which has now begun construction. This comment caught my eye:

The project may prise open extra dimensions and create baby black holes

You know, baby black holes have a habit of eating things, and growing bigger…

Of course I’m not the only one to have thought of that:

Cern officials are keen to point out that there is no reason to be alarmed by artificial black holes. “You should not deduce that we are ready to build a black hole and Cern along with the planet will disappear, although this is a letter I receive every week,” said Robert Aylmar, head of Cern.

But hey, no week should pass without a new media flap about how we are all going to die, right?

Natural Fireworks

One of the things I love about oceanography is that the denizens of the deep are so weird and wonderful. In particular deep sea fish are bioluminescent – that is they make their own light. So what, I have always wondered, does it look like down there? Now I know. The very clever folks at Oceanlab have been taking film in the briny deep. You can see some of it here. The final clip is fabulous.

Going East is Bad for You

I’ve always found the jet lag I get from flying east to be much worse than what I suffer from going west. I have joked that this is because going east means going back to the UK, and theorized that it might be because I’m an evening person with a circadian rhythm longer than 24 hours, whereas morning people, those who like getting up early, might fare better going eastwards. Now this week’s Economist weighs in with news of an experiment that seems to suggest that, at least for rodents, traveling east is much worse for your health than traveling west.

I just know Kevin is going to use this as an excuse for not getting up in the morning. 🙂

Update: Link fixed as per Kendall’s comment below.

The Beeb on the Singularity

Tonight’s Horizon focuses on Ray Kurzweil and human evolution. Obviously viewers outside the UK won’t be able to watch, but there’s a lot of information about the program here.

I’m staying at the Clute’s tonight on my way to San Francisco so I’m not sure if I’ll be able to watch it myself.

Building with Quarks

OK, who’s up to speed on their fundamental particles? No, OK, here’s a bit of background.

Baryons are particles that are made up of three quarks. The most famous are the proton, made from two Up quarks and one Down quark, and the neutron, made from one Up quark and two Down quarks.

But quarks come in six flavors: Up, Down, Top, Bottom, Strange and Charm. Which, of course, leaves the way open for all sorts of entertainingly different baryons. My favorite is the omega minus baryon (Ω−), which is made of three Strange quarks. But the odd things about baryons is that no one has ever seen one containing a Bottom quark: until now.

So congratulations to Fermilab for their clever data mining. Here’s hoping they manage to find even more types of baryons. The world would be a boring place if we could not find a baryon with three bottoms.

Mesons Behaving Badly

Here’s one for all of you particle physics wonks. It would appear that the decay of B mesons proceeds a way that is very different to that predicted by the Standard Model of quantum mechanics. The explanation is way beyond my 30-year-old understanding of particle physics, but I do know enough about science to know that when experimental results differ wildly from theoretical predictions interesting things are likely to happen.

(Love the penguin diagram too.)

Brin TV

David Brin writes to tell me that he will be on TV tonight. The show he is part of, The ArchiTechs, airs on The History Channel at 11:00pm with repeats tomorrow at 3:00am and the 14th at 11:00am. (I’m assuming the scheduling is fixed to air the shows at the same time in all time zones, but David may be quoting West Coast times). Apparently David is one of a group of experts who will be called upon to have clever thoughts about engineering and stuff. More details here. As I don’t get to Boston until late on the 14th I’m expecting a report from someone, please?

Damned Biology

So ladies, ever had one of those days when you get up, think, “what shall I wear today?” and decide to go glam, or that you can’t be bothered? Think you have free will in this decision? Oh dear. Go read this.

“Near ovulation, women dress to impress, and the closer women come to ovulation, the more attention they appear to pay to their appearance,” said Martie Haselton, the study’s lead author and a UCLA associate professor of communication studies and psychology. “They tend to put on skirts instead of pants, show more skin and generally dress more fashionably.”

I tend to be rather suspicious of psychology experiments, but this one seems to have been done with a fair amount of care. The sample size was rather small, but they did make a serious effort not to bias their definition of what “dressing attractively” meant.

Add this to my prevous post about women being more risk averse when they have high levels of estrogen in their bodies and it all starts to get rather scary. I’m sure that someone will be able to identify what hormones or whatever trigger the “sexy dressing” behavior pattern. Pheromonal warfare, anyone? (And yes, there will be things that work on men too. We know that, don’t we.)

Teleportation News

Thanks to Deanna Hoak for spotting this one. Physicists in Denmark have apparently succeeded in producing quantum entanglement on a macro level – involving trillions of atoms according to this report. There’s not a lot of information available as yet because Prof. Polzik and his team have announced their work through a letter to the editor of Nature. There is, as yet, no official paper as far as I can see. The letter itself is available through Nature’s web site, but only if you pay $30 for it, so I’m going to go look for an old-fashioned paper edition instead. In the meantime I’ll see if I can get in touch with Oliver Morton.

Update: Here’s Scientific American’s take on the experiment.

Update 2: The Nature podcast has an interview with Professor Polzik that sheds some more light on the subject (and includes the usual Star Trek jokes). One thing to note is that the current techniques for quantum teleportation, while they can transfer large amount of information instantaneously over a long distance, do require a classical (i.e. non-quantum) signal connecting the two sites. The SFnal goal of FtL Communication is therefore ruled out, at least for now.

The Polzik interview is, of course, the last item on the podcast, but there’s other interesting stuff in it too. I was interested to learn, for example, that lions can count, although I think we should all have known that the mammal with the most powerful bite is the Tasmanian Devil. How long the podcast will be available is uncertain. I expect a new one will be up on the 12th, but that you can find the Polzik on in the archives after that.

Update 3: Here’s another summary of the experiment. It isn’t clear quite how much information is being transferred in the teleport, but this article notes that it was achieved with a fidelity of 0.6 (i.e. 60% accuracy) which it compares favorably with the 0.5 you’d expect from a classical information transfer. It is interesting that the quantum entanglement is so much more accurate (and that the “real world” is so inaccurate). At the same time, however, I’d be disinclined to trust a Star Trek-style teleporter that was only 60% accurate.

Estrogen is Good for You

Here’s another one of those scientific studies looking at differences between women and men. Like any good scientific study it is highly stylized. It looks specifically at behavior in an economic bidding game. The women in the sample tended to make less money, on average, than the men, because they were more risk averse. Interestingly, however, this result only held true during certain parts of the women’s menstrual cycle. At other times they did just as well as the men in the game. It would seem, from the results, that having an elevated amount of estrogen in your system makes you more risk averse.

All sorts of nonsense can be talked about results like this. There will be people who claim that it “proves” that women make bad businessmen, for example, and therefore should not be allowed to run companies. This makes about as much sense as saying that, because Roger Federer is a better tennis player than Venus Williams, that all men are better at tennis than all women, so women’s tennis should be scrapped. Differences between individuals can be much greater than the average difference between genders.

What the study does show it what it says: people with more estrogen in their systems are, on average, more risk averse than people without. This probably means that, on average, women make worse gamblers and commodity traders than men. It may also men that, on average, they are less likely to do daft things like drive while drunk, or declare war on other countries. It would seem to me that those are probably good things.

Robots R Us

Those of you who live in New York still have one day left to pop along to Wired’s NextFest exhibition. To whet your appetite, here’s a review of the event with details of some of the types of robot on display.

All of which makes me even more sad that Wired’s coverage of Worldcon consisted largely of poking fun at fandom.