How Not To Engage With Government

As Twitter followers will know, I spent today in London at an event run by the Government Equalities Office. They wanted to hear from trans activists about our thoughts on the media. Interesting, you would have thought.

Of course the event was in London, and started early enough in the morning to ensure that anyone coming from outside the city either had to pay a fortune in peak hour fares or get a hotel room for the previous night. Even then the fares aren’t cheap. I wouldn’t have been able to go if I wasn’t able to stay with friends (thanks Karo & Tommi), and if LGBT Bristol hadn’t offered to help with the cost. Now I’m feeling guilty about putting in an expenses claim, because the event was a total waste of my time.

That wasn’t because of the government people, who spent the morning either listening respectfully or asking useful questions. Nor was it the fault of Vicky from the LGBT Consortium who organized the meeting. Rather it was because of the relentlessly negative attitude of some of the other attendees.

OK, I know I don’t have much experience of talking to national government. But here are a few things I would think are obvious.

1. If you are asked to provide some positive suggestions of ways forward, don’t spent the entire time moaning about things that don’t work, especially if the things you are moaning about are things that the civil servants you are talking to can’t do much about.

2. If other people put forward positive suggestions, don’t immediately jump on them and dismiss those suggestions.

3. If you are lucky enough to have a local authority offering significant amounts of money for trans people to take a role in local decision-making, don’t tell the national government people that the initiative in question is a waste of time because trans people don’t come forward to take part.

The first half of the morning was actually quite good. We went through the really quite heartwarming amount of media coverage of trans people that is going on. Only yesterday it was announced that a trans actor was being cast in a trans part in Eastenders. That’s huge. Of course there are always things that can be done better, but the improvement over the last few years (basically since My Transsexual Summer aired) has been dramatic.

There were good points made by people like Jane Fae that the national media isn’t making programs for trans people, it is making them for cis people. But that doesn’t mean that you can’t tweak the language, and the narratives, to present trans people in a better light. Sense8 did this very well, and Jane herself came up with some great ideas for how trans characters in soaps could be involved in trans-related plots without everything having to be a transition story.

I was also pleased to see that some people had noticed that the US media do a rather better job on diversity than the UK does, rather than just assume that British is Best. More of this later.

The second half of the morning was where Vicky wanted us to come up with some ideas for going forward, and it was moan, moan, moan, moan, moan, moan, moan, moan, moan.

Sometimes that’s the only thing you can do. Meetings with the NHS tend to go that way. That’s partly because we are talking directly to the people responsible for treating us appallingly, and partly because there’s nothing much we can do to work around the issue. The media situation is different.

I quite understand that people like Helen Belcher and Jane Fae are sick and tired of beating their heads against the national newspapers and getting nowhere. The regulatory regime that we have now is, if anything, worse than we had before the Leveson inquiry. But that’s not just us. Even the Prime Minister can’t stop the Daily Mail writing malicious articles about him. What chance do we have?

In any case, complaining doesn’t work. These days any company or public body worth its salt employs teams of people to ensure than customer complaints are deflected. That’s either passively through endless bureaucracy, or aggressively through legal threats. Again, that’s not just us. Everyone has this problem. There’s not much that anyone in the Civil Service can do to fix it.

Equally we are not going to have much luck with the national TV companies, or with Hollywood, unless we have money (like the Wachowskis) or can pitch them ideas they find attractive.

The reason that the Americans do much better than we do on diversity is that they have a bigger market, and can make money with diverse programming. We don’t have that in the UK. We have local media. The problem is that they can’t make money. Community radio, community TV, operations like Bristol 24/7, all rely to a large extent on volunteer labor. It is the same in publishing. The big multi-nationals are obsessed with finding the next best seller, while small presses do a much better job on diversity.

By working with community media we can get trans people involved in program creation, and even presenting programs. We can also get stories that are much more trans-positive. It’s not sexy. It’s not glamorous. But it makes a difference, and it can be done for comparatively small sums of money. Frankly, most community media companies are so strapped for cash that if they government were to offer small grants for diversity-related programming they’d find people queuing up to apply for them.

However, if I want to make that happen it is pretty clear that I’ll have to do it my myself, or with the help of supportive cis people.

Spontaneous “Sex Changes” – For Real

OK, so “sex change” is not a approved term these days, and anyway doesn’t really happen as such, but that doesn’t stop people wishing. I know when I was a kid I used to go to bed dreaming that when I hit puberty I’d grow breasts and start to menstruate. It didn’t happen. I guess that trans boys go to sleep at night dreaming that when they hit puberty they’ll grow penises. And the interesting thing is that some of them get lucky. It really does happen.

Currently BBC2 is running a short series of medical documentaries fronted by Michael Mosley and titled, Countdown to Life. They are all about the weird and wonderful things that can go on during embryo development in the womb. Doctors tend to call these things “developmental disorders”. I prefer to call them expressions of natural human diversity. Some of the conditions Mosley talks about in the series are trans- and intersex-related.

Depending on exactly how things go as you are growing from an egg into a person, interesting things can happen that mark you out from the mass of humanity. You might become left-handed. You might become an albino. You might grow six digits on your hands and feet instead of five. Or you might develop an intersex condition.

You may have heard me talk before about Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. This is an intersex condition in which the body is unable to process testosterone. The child has XY chromosomes, but the Y has no effect because testosterone can’t do the job of masculinizing the body. These people are born looking perfectly female, grow up as girls, and go through puberty as girls. They grow breasts, but probably don’t menstruate. Often they don’t discover the truth about their biology until they have treatment for infertility and discover that they have no wombs.

Last night’s program introduced me to a different testosterone-related condition. It is known as Guevedoce, a term derived from a small Puerto Rican community where it is quite common. Children who have this condition lack the ability to make a special version of testosterone called dihydro-testosterone without which male genitalia do not develop in the womb. Consequently the children are assigned female at birth. But, like the people with AIS, these kids have XY chromosomes. The term Guevedoce translates as “penis at twelve”, because when puberty hits and a new surge of testosterone floods the body the developmental process gets kicked into gear and the kids, quite naturally, grow penises.

The really interesting thing about these two conditions is that most kids with AIS identify as girls, even before puberty, and tend to be distraught when their condition is discovered, especially if, as is generally the case they can’t have kids. In contrast, Guevedoces tend to identify as boys long before puberty reveals the truth about their biology, and they are delighted when they grow penises.

Here we have two very similar intersex conditions, one of which normally results in a gender identity at odds with the chromosomal sex, and one of which normally results in a gender identity congruent with the chromosomal sex. That’s pretty impressive circumstantial evidence that gender identity is a biological thing.

Mosley agrees. Later in the program he features a trans girl from California and explains, as I already knew, that the embryonic process that results in gender differentiation of the brain is separate from, and occurs at a different time to, the process that results in gender differentiation of the body. He sounded convinced that a biological explanation for being trans will be found.

Of course it isn’t that simple. It may well be that the process that causes someone with XY chromosomes to be trans is different from that which causes people with XX chromosomes to be trans. People who are non-binary may turn out to have a mild form of one or other of these conditions, or they may be something else entirely. In any case it shouldn’t matter. Trans people very obviously exist, and treatments are very obviously highly effective. We shouldn’t need a biological explanation to treat trans people as ordinary, sane human beings.

However, the more science like this we discover, the more obvious it becomes that those people who try to claim that “science” proves that trans people can’t exist make no more sense than those people who say that the Bible proves that trans people can’t exist. I think we’ve reached the point where we have to lump them in with evolution deniers and flat earthers.

I Am Cait – Episode 8

The show has clearly been building up to a grand finale of Caitlyn and Kris facing off, and indeed has trailed this whenever they could. Thankfully, while it did take up a substantial part of the show, it was not all of it.

I’ve said this before and I’ll say this again. When it comes to family, there’s no point in arguing. Unless they have treated you really badly, people will always side with them rather than you. So do what they want. If that means no further contact, or putting up with them going on about what a selfish bastard you are, you just have to put up with it. Any attempt to do otherwise will just prove them right in most people’s eyes. Also, if you really do care about them, give them space to come to terms with what is going on. You have the benefit of finally being free, they don’t.

Anyway, the first half of the show was cringe-worthy. The second half was thought-provoking. Cait decided that she needed a re-naming ceremony, and so Jenny brought in Allyson Robinson, a trans woman who is also a Baptist Minister, to perform it. Candis managed to drag along Boy George to sing, and a great deal of sisterhood was on view.

One way of looking at this is that it was a cynical attempt to get Christian America onside, but Cait does seem sincere in her beliefs so despite my deep distrust of reality TV I’m happy to go along with it. There’s no reason why trans women shouldn’t be spiritual. We have, after all, been deeply involved in religion for millennia.

It was the fact of the re-naming ceremony that got to me. As Cait said, most trans women don’t have one. One of the reasons for that is that we mostly go through the process with little or no support, and often in secret. When I did my official name change I had no one nearby I could celebrate with. When I got my new birth certificate I was in the UK and Kevin was in California, and anyway I didn’t want to be public about it.

I think it would have been nice to have had some sort of celebration, but it would have been even better to have been able to go through the transition process with a bunch of friends. Even Caitlyn didn’t manage that. Perhaps, with all of this new visibility, it will happen more often.

Anyway, I was really happy to see Chandi play a major part in the ceremony, and to see Geena Rocero among the guests at the re-naming. Hopefully that will make trans women of color think that whatever benefits flow from Cait’s show will help them too.

I see from the social media gossip today that the show has been renewed for a second season, despite disappointing ratings. Apparently the audience for the final episode was 1.3 million. I’m guessing that a substantial proportion of that was trans people. There are probably more than 1.3 million of us in the USA. I know that’s cynical of me, but I don’t think most cis people care enough to want to listen to our stories.

Treasures of the Indus

So I promised you a second post. Then I got distracted by emails from clients. Sorry, back on it now.

In fact, here it is. Treasure of the Indus is another 3-part history series. It is part of BBC4’s India series. The history of women rates a show on BBC2. The history of India and Pakistan does not. This is a shame, because this too is a very good series.

It is presented by Sona Datta who has the benefit of Indian ancestry, though she was born in London. Her family are from Kolkata, which puts her right in the mix as far as the whole India/Pakistan/Bangladesh situation goes. Yes, I know that is very recent history, but current affairs tend to have their roots in the past, if only because the idiot British will have messed things up with their inept colonial rule.

Episode 1 is all about Pakistan. Two things stand out. Firstly the people of Pakistan were building enormous cities 5,000 years ago when Europe was still in what gets called the Stone Age. Check out Mohenjo-daro and Harappa. Secondly, Pakistan was a Buddhist country long before the invention of Islam, and indeed it exported Buddhism to the rest of the world.

Episode 2 is all about the Mughal Empire; that is, the Islamic conquest of Pakistan and Northern India, and the subsequent flowering of a truly magnificent civilization. Someone had to build the Taj Mahal, right? And of course the Taj was a tomb for a much loved queen. Mughal emperors had lots of wives, but they were more fond of some than others. If you want to learn much more about Nur Jahan than Amanda Foreman had time for in Ascent of Woman, watch this program.

The final episode is about the rest of India, which today is predominantly a Hindu culture. Given the polytheistic nature of Hinduism, I had always assumed that it was a survival of more ancient beliefs. I was very surprised to find out that it is a more recent religion than Buddhism, and indeed displaced Buddhism in much of India. Hindiusm has a very neo-pagan approach to religion, allowing people to find their own path to God through a bewildering choice of deities. Datta couldn’t resist having a go at Western religions for their inability to adapt to a scientific worldview, and threw in some stuff that would make Fritjof Capra proud (yes, I’m am aging Hippy, sue me).

I love that we are getting more documentaries fronted by women, and by people of color telling their own cultures’ stories. There is so much history that we didn’t get taught in school.

The Ascent of Woman – Part 3

The third and, it seems, final part of The Ascent of Woman was broadcast last night. This one looked at more recent times, but continued the international flavor. There were six women featured in all, some of which were very familiar to me and others who were not.

First up was Empress Theodora of Byzantium, whom you all should know as she has been the subject of fine novels by Guy Gavriel Kay and Stella Duffy.

Then there was Hildegard of Bingen, who among other things was the first person in the world to write down musical compositions. The section in which Amanda Foreman chats to a German nun about Hildegard’s writings on the female orgasm is priceless.

Christine de Pizan is another character who should be well know as she is widely cited as the author of the first work of feminist philosophy. Her two books on The City of Ladies were apparently very popular with women politicians of the time.

Given that this was a BBC series, we had to have one British woman in it. The honor went to Queen Elizabeth I, and was accompanied by some rather jingoistic nonsense (not from Foreman) about the primacy of Shakespearean English in world literature.

After that it was off around the world again, and two women who were much less familiar to me. The first was Roxelanna, the chief wife of Suleiman the Magnificent. She is believed to have been a Russian rather than a Turk, and she played a very powerful role in the governance of the Ottoman Empire. Suleiman was no mug, of course, but together they made an exceptionally capable couple.

The final slot went to Nur Juhan who was the chief wife of the Mughal emperor, Jahangir. I knew next to nothing about her before the program, but like Roxelanna and Theodora she appears to have been an exceptionally capable politician and indispensable to her husband’s rule.

Overall I was really pleased with the series. It did turn out to be mostly a story of specific women rather than a history of womankind, but I loved the international focus that it had. I’m disappointed that it didn’t cover the Americas and Africa (save for a brief mention of Hatshepsut), and I’m sure than Foreman could have filled an entire season had she been given the budget. But it is a start, and judging from my Twitter feed something that has captured the imagination of women viewers.

I’d say “more please”, except that we actually have more, just not from the same person. There’s another post coming.

Today On Ujima – Feminism and Fringe

Yeah, I have been back on the radio again. Paulette is still in Jamaica so I was allowed to put the whole show together myself. What I wasn’t expecting was that I’d end up learning to be an engineer on the job. I’ve had a bit of training on the desk before, but this is the first time I have actually done it live myself. There were a few very minor gaps in the flow where I had a panic as to which button to push, but mostly it was very smooth. Huge thanks are due to my colleague, Jack, who was keeping an eye on me and pointing out when I had forgotten something.

Anyway, the show began with discussion of the current furor in the UK over the election of Jeremy Corbyn to be leader of the Labour Party. As I said on the show, I’m not a Socialist, but the behavior of the mainstream media, the right wing of the Labour Party, and even the Prime Minister has been so childish that you can’t help but have sympathy and respect for Corbyn. I’m not surprised that there has been a flood of people joining Labour since he was elected. My colleagues, Judeline and Jack, offered their opinions.

Next up I talked a bit about the Ascent of Woman documentary series that is airing on BBC 2 at the moment. I’ve talked a lot about it here already, so I won’t go into that again.

After the news we were joined by Tom Parker and Jasmine Atkins-Smart of the Tobacco Tea Theatre Company. You may remember Tom from his appearance at BristolCon Fringe. The they have been up in Edinburgh performing in a play called The Accidental Adventures of Sherlock Holmes in which Tom played Doctor Watson and Jasmine played Sherlock. We chatted a bit about what it was like being at Fringe as performers, about the theatre scene in Bristol, and about Sherlock as a cultural phenomenon.

Next up we were supposed to have Cezara Nanu of Bristol Women’s Voice talking about modern slavery. Sadly she had caught a chill, probably from running the Bristol Half Marathon on Sunday (where she was raising money for refugees) so we gave the actors a little longer and then covered the slavery issue as well as we could by ourselves. Judeline and Jack had done some great research.

Finally we touched on an issue that arose out of the media panic over Mr Corbyn, the idea of women-only railway carriages. That naturally broadened out into the topic of safe spaces in general. I chipped in with the issue as to whether trans women were allowed in women’s spaces, and put poor Jack on the spot as our representative of men.

If you want to listen to the show you can find the first hour here and the second hour here.

The playlist for the show was as follows:

  • Tracy Chapman – Talking ’bout a revolution
  • Bob Marley – Revolution
  • Elvis Costello – Watching the Detectives
  • Isaac Hayes – Shaft
  • Mavis Staples – Eyes on the Prize
  • Nina Simone – Young, Gifted and Black
  • Duke Ellington – Take the A Train
  • John Coltrane – Blue Train

I Am Cait – Episode 7

From my point of view the highlight of this episode was where Cait and Candis visit a support group for trans kids in LA that is run by Chandi. That’s partly because Chandi is fast becoming my favorite part of the show. She’s so sensible and grounded, and so amazingly herself. But it was also the real bit of the show. It featured actual trans kids talking about the problems they have getting their ID changed, and the hassle that they get in the meantime. This is the sort of thing that someone with Cait’s level of privilege is able to avoid.

When Cait says that what she is trying to do with the show is make the world a better place for those kids, and for others who come after them, it makes the whole of the rest of it worthwhile.

The rest, in this episode, is mostly about Kris. The show’s producers, understandably, are determined to play up the family drama for all it is worth. There is no way that Cait, or indeed any trans person, can come out of such a situation looking good. Cis viewers, especially female cis viewers, are always going to end up sympathizing with the trans person’s wife. Mostly, I suspect, they’d be right to do so.

The show has tried to make the best of a bad job by bringing in Jenny Boylan’s wife, Deedie. It is good to be able to show that couples can stay together through transition (Jenny says that about a third do), and in the long term come to love and accept each other again. But even Deedie admits that during the transition process she was caught between the terror of the future with Jenny, and the terror of the future without her.

Caitlyn, of course, is too caught up in the desperate need to be herself, and the giddy excitement of having made it happen. I remember that all too well. But she too is worried about facing the rest of her life alone. Having had her family life define her for the past decade or so of living it in the public eye, she’s not prepared to face the black pit of abandonment that so many of us have walked into because there was nowhere else to go.

Of course when I got to the bottom of mine I found Kevin there waiting for me, and things got mostly better from then on. Other people are not so ridiculously lucky.

Her Story – Final Day

One of the big problems for trans activists is that we are not in control of the way we are presented in the media. We are, after all, a fairly small percentage of the population. In addition, until very recently we have been excluded from most forms of employment. So journalists, writers, directors, actors, all tend to be cis people. The result of this has often been inaccurate portrayals of trans folk in the media, and sometimes downright hostile ones.

Slowly things are changing. The Sense8 series benefited enormously from the involvement of Lana Wachowski and Jamie Clayton. Recent reality TV shows, and the sitcom on the BBC, have given trans people more prominence, and some say in how we are portrayed. But what if a group of trans people could make their own TV show, about people like them? That would be something special.

We are almost there. Her Story has completed principal photography and is crowdfunding $35,000 to fund post-production. They are 93% of their way to the target, and today is the final day of the campaign. The show involves Jen Richards and Angelica Ross, both of whom I have mentioned frequently here before. Most of the people involved in it are queer women of some sort. (There is one cis guy, because part of the story involves Angelica’s character struggling with the issue of disclosure.) I’ve backed it, obviously. I hope that some of you will be able to as well.

To learn lots more about the show check out the campaign page, or check out this interview on Autostraddle.

Update: They made it. Thank you everyone who backed the project.

The Ascent of Woman, Episode 2

The latest episode of Amanda Foreman’s Ascent of Woman series focused on Asia. It began with a celebration of the Trung Sisters, two Vietnamese women who rebelled against the conquering forces of Han China. The sisters were not just heroes of Vietnamese nationalism, they were heroes of feminism, because women were allowed to hold positions of power in traditional Vietnamese culture, but not in China.

It was, apparently, all the fault on Confucius, who was very fond of saying the women are inferior to men. Later Confucian scholars even manage to subvert the traditional symbolism of ying and yang, claiming that the masculine yang was more powerful than, and superior to, the feminine ying. Confucius does not come out of the program very well.

Fortunately for Chinese women there was always the option of Buddhism. Empress Wu, the notorious but highly capable Chinese ruler during the Tang period made extensive use of Buddhism in her struggle against the patriarchal Confucians.

The high point of the program was the point where Foreman visits Japan and gets to see what is believed to be the actual inkwell with which Murasaki Shikibu wrote The Tale of Genji, the first novel ever written, over 1000 years ago. Foreman was visibly moved by the experience. Quite right, I would have been too. Here it is.

Murasaki's inkwell

Harking back to yesterday’s discussion of translations, doubtless F R Leavis would have condemned Murasaki’s work for failing to convey a sense of Englishness. Well sod that. I particularly liked the Japanese author and nun that Foreman interviewed who claimed that Genji was a feminist work because in it the male hero, Genji, has relationships with many women and none of them are made happy as a result.

The final segment of the program focused on the practice of foot binding which was once commonplace in China and survived right into the 20th century. Unsurprisingly, this was the aspect of the program that the newspapers chose to focus on when reviewing it. Stories of mothers doing unspeakable things to their daughters for the sake of fashion appeal so much more to the tabloids than tales of women like Murasaki doing amazing things. Also it allows British readers to feel smugly superior to the barbaric foreigners. But, as Foreman said to me on Twitter, it got the series talked about, and if that meant a whole lot more people watching it that was a good thing.

I have no idea whether you can watch the series outside of the UK, but it is available on iPlayer and TunnelBear is your friend.

I Am Cait – Episode 6

Well that was a lot better. The latest episode of I Am Cait to be screened in the UK spent most of its time allowing trans people (almost all trans women) to talk about their problems, and let Caitlyn sit back, listen and learn.

The main focus of the episode was dating, and the very real dangers that trans women face trying to find love. A side issue is the fact that Caitlyn is deeply reluctant to discuss anything personal, and the implication that this is because she is primarily attracted to women and fears this will make people see her as less of a woman. Jenny Boylan is doing her best, but I’m not sure this is something Caitlyn can do in the public glare.

There were two key things that stood out to me from the show. The first is that Candis, despite being drop-dead gorgeous, incredibly sexy and a famous actress, can’t get a boyfriend. The other was where a bunch of trans women were having dinner together and they all agreed that there was no point in even trying to date cis men, they should just stick to trans men.

Obviously it isn’t the case that no trans woman can find love with a cis man. Janet Mock is an obvious counter-example. So am I. But dating is really hard, and incredibly dangerous. The best you can hope for is to be continually rejected and insulted; violence and even murder are always a risk. However, I find the idea that we should stick to only dating trans men (or trans women if you prefer) very troubling. Not because there aren’t some lovely trans guys out there, there most definitely are, but because it is a tacit admission that we are not women, we are only trans women.

As ever, the stars of the show are the support cast. Jenny Boylan and Canis Cayne were great as always, and I am becoming very fond of Chandi who is an amazing person.

The Ascent of Woman

The BBC has started a new, four-part documentary series called The Ascent of Woman. The title is, of course, a reference to the legendary 1973 series on the history of science, The Ascent of Man, fronted by Dr Jacob Bronowski. This series, fronted by Dr. Amanda Foreman, is more of a cultural history, specifically about the role of women in society.

It is, fairly obviously, a feminist history. One of Foreman’s objectives is to highlight great women of history. She’s also trying to explain why women have been so badly thought of, particularly in Christian and Islamic society. I was pleased to see her finger Aristotle, who really does have a lot to answer for. An expert on ancient Greek culture that she talked to in the first program said that the position of women in Athenian society, that supposed bastion of democracy, was analogous to that in Afghanistan under the Taliban.

From our point of view, however, a particularly interesting point made by Foreman regards the origin of literature. There are lots of ways in which women have set firsts in the arts. Mary Shelley is widely regarded as having written the first science fiction novel. The honor of being the world’s first novel appears to belong to the Tale of Genji, written by Murasaki Shikibu in the early 11th Century. It is also worth noting that the first written musical compositions were produced by Hildegard of Bingen. But who was the world’s first author?

Obviously we don’t know. People will have been telling stories around camp fires since before the dawn of civilization. However, we do know the name of the first person to sign their name to a literary work. She was Enheduanna, the daughter of Sargon the Great who ruled over the Sumerian Empire in the 23rd Century BCE. She was also High Priestess of the Moon, and the most important religious leader in the country. Enheduanna wrote a considerable amount of religious poetry, mostly in praise of the goddess Inanna (Ishtar).

So there we have it. Women writers, they have been at it for more than four millennia. Perhaps it is time for people to notice that we exist.

Catching Up With Jazz

My friend Lynn Gold recommended the I Am Jazz TV show as a better representation of trans life than I Am Cait. It turns out it was available on my Sky subscription, and in the On Demand section, so I have binged on the first five episodes. Here’s my initial impressions.

By far the best thing about the show is Jazz herself. She’s a delightful kid, and I’m sure viewers will warm to her. Because she’s only mid-teens, there’s far less trans theory stuff in the show than in Jenner’s. However, Jazz’s life is real in a way like Caitlyn’s never can be. Her family seem well off but are not stupidly rich. She goes to school. And most importantly she’s been living as Jazz for around 10 years. She’s totally comfortable with her identity, and so are her family. Whereas Caitlyn’s story is one of someone coming to terms with transition while a celebrity, Jazz’s story is one of an ordinary teenage girl with something slightly different about her that can at times make her life a misery.

In some ways the show is simply one about a middle class American couple raising four teenage kids. Having twin boys is sometimes just as challenging as having a trans daughter. It is about the very normal fears that any teenage girl will have when she’s about to enter high school. But for Jazz every kid in the class will know that she’s a soft target for bullying, and dating is going to be an absolute minefield. As she’s so normal in every other way, the tragedy of that is really brought home. Anyone who has ever been the “only X kid” in a class can probably relate to what she’s going through.

Of course the show, just like Cait’s, is manufactured. There are things that don’t ring true. For the first four episodes Jazz is presented as this normal teenage girl, but in episode 5 we discover that she’s co-written a kids’ book that has sold over 10,000 copies and has an international fan base. Overall, however, I really liked it, and I think it is probably doing a lot of good.

I Am Cait – Episodes 4 and 5

The more I watch of the Caitlyn Jenner reality show, the more I become convinced that focusing on people going through transition is a really bad thing. There were some good parts to the last two episodes — the introduction of Kate Bornstein, Chas Bono working with trans kids in Los Angeles, Candis giving a shout out to Holly Woodlawn, the crowds at New York Pride — but the was also a lot of what I had feared from the show: relationship drama. Episode 4 contained various confrontations with members of Jenner’s family; and episode 5 some awkward moments with a guy who used to be a close friend of Cait’s while she was still pretending to be male.

Very similar things can be found in just about every book, comic, film and TV program made about trans people. What the authors or scriptwriters want is drama. The easiest way to get drama is to focus in on the hardest part of a trans person’s life — the point at which they are just coming out and they, their friends and family, are all getting used to the new arrangements.

The other thing about focusing on transition is that it almost inevitably shows trans people as half-and-half. They are moving from the social role that they used to inhabit to a new one; they are waiting for hormones to work their magic. Even avowedly non-binary people often don’t look their best when they are just starting transition. For binary-focused trans people, they are pretty much guaranteed to look their worst.

I’m not just dumping on Caitlyn here. You see it everywhere. It was in the recent Transsexual Stories program on BBC Scotland. From the reactions I’m seeing to the trailer it is going to be in The Danish Girl, the new Eddie Redmayne film about Lili Elbe. Transition is what fascinates cis people — writers and audiences alike.

Caitlyn’s show is at least trying. It makes a point of featuring a large supporting cast of trans women who are long past transition: Jenny Boylan, Candis Cayne, Jen Richards and the amazing Chandi who I am becoming very fond of. All of these women give a glimpse of the sort of person that Caitlyn will become in a few years time. The Scottish show managed a bit of it, with the delightful Jan and the amazing transformation of Carla. However, successful trans women are not the focus of these shows, because there is no drama in their lives.

I have no in principle objection to cis people writing trans characters. In fact I’m pleased that so many of them are trying to do so. But I do wish that they would learn to see us as people, and not just as people going through transition. If you need drama, find it in some other way, not in the fact that we are trans.

Girl on a Motorbike

Batgirl

As regular readers will know, my favorite comics character growing up was Jean Grey. But she wasn’t the only redhead superhero around. Reading Gail Simone’s obituary for Yvonne Craig last night, it occurred to me that Babs is probably the reason I grew up loving motorbikes.

Thanks Yvonne, you were awesome. — A Fan

I Am Cait – Episode 3

The latest episode of the trans sisterhood reality show continues the road trip started in episode 2. I seem to be getting the habit of reviewing each show, so here goes.

The material from the meeting at the HRC offices in San Francisco was used again at the start of this episode, and was much better edited. Some of it is still a bit weird. I don’t understand why the camera has to spend so much time on Angelica Ross but not when she is speaking. I dearly love Chandi, and Blossom is clearly an inspiring person, but there seems to be some sort of unspoken subtext that it is OK for the white girls to be both classically beautiful and articulate, but not for the black girls.

Much of the show was devoted to Caitlyn taking her new friends on some adventures. There was rollerskating, dirt biking, and wine tasting. I loved the fact that they did something that was not stereotypically feminine.

Jenny Boylan continues to shine through as a saintly elder. Judging from Twitter, she’s getting a lot of great response from fans of the show. Jen Richards didn’t get so many opportunities to be smart this time, but she was brilliant on the subject of being able to tell if someone is trans.

There needs to be a party game in which you give a bunch of pictures of pretty cis women to a group of men and ask if they would have known that these women were trans. Then you have a good laugh at all of the random explanations they come up with to justify the fact that of course they would have known. And finally you watch their faces when you tell them that the women are actually all cis.

The dating discussion was much less prominent than it had been trailed to be, and was fairly coy. Probably that’s a good thing because we don’t want the audience focusing on genitalia. On the other hand, there are myths that need exploding. The TERFs still go around claiming that trans women can’t enjoy sex because we have “mutilated ourselves”. I wish someone had addressed that.

Mostly it wasn’t a very interesting episode, though it did make me very homesick for California. Next week, however, Cait gets to meet Kate Bornstein, which should be fascinating.

I Am Cait – Episode 2

I was slightly more organized this weekend and got to see episode 2 of I Am Cait shortly after it was broadcast. Thoughts, I have them.

One of the things that comes over quite strongly in this episode is how innocent Caitlyn is about the whole trans scene, and the lives of other trans people. I guess in her position there was no possibility of mixing with other trans girls prior to transition, but that means she has got a lot of catching up to do. Still, I feel a little bit better to know that even Candis Cayne has trouble getting her hormone prescriptions. My own troubles don’t seem quite so bad now.

Something else that came through during the episode is Caitlyn’s right wing politics. The main plot of the show (and yes, reality TV does have plots) was that Jenny Boylan introduced Caitlyn to a bunch of other trans women, and they persuaded her to come up to San Francisco to meet others. Even in California, many trans people have fairly terrible lives. Cait, who has doubtless ingested a regular diet of Faux News, seemed to think it was more important to get them off benefits than to help them. Like I said, a lot to learn.

Jenny Boylan and Jen Richards seem to be doing a good job of education, and some of Jen’s expressions when Cait comes out with some horribly naive comment are a wonder to behold.

I now know why Angelica Ross was so upset. That was a truly vicious piece of editing that she was subjected to. I guess that because she is a) black and b) very pretty, the show’s editors decided to single her out for her involvement in sex work. Something needs to be done to stop that sort of thing happening in future episodes.

It was particularly annoying because, as Angelica noted on Twitter, it came shortly after a clip in which Jen said that it was important not to reduce trans women to their traumas. Yes, many of us have had terrible aspects to our lives. But those of us who have survived that have often gone on to do amazing things too. Angelica is one such person.

Jen, who has a particular facility with sound bites, came up with another interesting comment elsewhere in the show. She said that from a PR point of view, what the trans community needs after Caitlyn is for a male celebrity to go public with the fact that he is dating a trans girl and thinks she’s a wonderful woman. It’s not like it doesn’t happen, but of course if the tabloids find out the guy always dumps the girl and tries to pretend he never had anything to do with her (not looking at anyone in particular, Danny Cipriani).

Talking of which, if there are any guys out there who don’t think that trans girls can be pretty, tune in and get an eyeful of Candis, because that girl is smoking! Respect, sister! Loved the lace dress too.

Talking of relationships, Jen Richards and Angelica Ross are two of the main driving forces behind Her Story, a TV series about trans women and love. The material is all shot, but they need money for post-production. Go here and help.

Sense8 News

This hot off the presses. Well, off Twitter and email anyway.

A couple of hours ago an announcement went out on Twitter that Netflix has renewed Sense8 for a second series. I am very happy. Doubtless it will be a while before they can get it all filmed, but I shall wait patiently for the new episodes to turn up.

In addition to that, Netflix sent me email to alert me to the fact that a documentary called Sense8: Creating the World was now available to view. Naturally I went straight there.

The show lasts about 25 minutes and is primarily interviews with the cast members at various locations around the world. Much of it is shot on set during production. Lana and Andy do not speak to camera, but JMS does get in at one point.

A lot of the focus is on the technical challenges of filming in nine different cities around the world. There were no stand-in locations. Scenes in Mumbai were shot in Mumbai; scenes in Nairobi were shot in Nairobi and so on. That provided particular challenges for the crew. It also gave the show an opportunity to increase the diversity quotient of the show. Not all of the cast members were native to their character’s native cities (though several were). However, when the show was filming on location they hired local talent to play the supporting cast.

Andy and Lana were not afraid of taking on challenges either. The scenes at San Francisco Pride were shot live during San Francisco Pride. Tuppence Middleton got to DJ live in a Camden nightclub sandwiched between two live bands. The scenes at the Mexican wrestling match were shot live at an actual match. The only thing that defeated them was the Ganesha festival. Some shots of the actual parade were shot from roof cameras, but with over a million people on the streets it just wasn’t possible to shoot in amongst the parade, especially as child actors were involved.

The show also highlighted the way in which many of the “effects” were actually shot live. Many scenes require members of the cluster who are not physically present at a location to move in and out of shot, replacing the local cluster member, or acting alongside them. Most of that was done physically, with the camera changing focus just long enough to allow an actor to duck in or out of the shot. I’m guessing that made the whole thing much more natural for the actors, because they were acting together (contrast that with Sir Ian McKellen’s discomfort at having to act by himself against a green screen during the filming of The Hobbit). It probably also saved time and money on editing, which I guess is important when you are doing TV.

Finally a brief word on the process of creating a series for full on-demand release. Before the advent of things like Netflix TV shows tended to be shot and aired in parallel. The crew would still be working on later episodes while the first few were aired. You can’t do that with direct-to-Netflix. You have to have everything in the can before going live. But, as the video editors explained, that meant you could actually screen the whole thing as a 12-hour movie, then make final edits based on that experience. And they did just that.

My thanks to Lana and Andy for the great news, and for an interesting documentary. I’m assuming that the next thing that will happen is a DVD & Blu Ray release of Season One, and I’m hoping that will include more behind-the-scenes material.

Meeting Cait

Last night I finally got to watch episode 1 of I Am Cait, the Caitlyn Jenner reality show. I figure I should probably say a few things.

First up, Jenner’s trans identity seems very genuine. All of the talk about having struggled with it for years, and family hoping that she could be “cured”, is very familiar to many other trans people. It also seems to me that Jenner is very genuine in her desire to help other trans people, using her celebrity to do so. How effective she can be is another matter.

On the one hand, Jenner is very famous. She has a platform that no other (out) trans person can match. Because of that she can reach segments of the population that would otherwise ignore trans issues. She may even gain their sympathy when others would not.

On the other hand, it was clear watching the show that it is being made at the worst possible time for the message it wants to convey. Obviously both Jenner and the network want to cash in on the story while it is still hot. But transition is a difficult time of life, both for trans people and for their families.

Jenner has done what she can physically by getting a lot of treatment in advance of the announcement. This is important because trans people do grow into themselves over the years. While it shouldn’t be necessary for trans people to look gender-normative, for a show like this it helps a lot that Jenner has been able to put a lot of effort into her appearance. For most people it takes time for the hormones to work their magic.

What you can’t do in advance is get your family used to the change. It is often the case that those who know you best, and who are most closely emotionally connected to you, find it hardest to adapt to your transition. It is particularly difficult for Jenner’s family because they know that they are in the public spotlight, and will be judged on how they behave on camera. In all probability they will get used to Caitlyn, will get the pronouns right, and will come to accept her for who she is. But it will take time, and they haven’t been given that time. Consequently the public are going to see some very uncomfortable family moments, and assume that transition is much worse for a family than it often is.

The other major problem with the series is that, no matter how committed Jenner is to doing it right, she probably can’t control how the shows are edited, and she certainly can’t control how they are reported. In episode two Jenner is seen meeting a number of high profile trans rights activists. One of them is Angelica Ross. Yesterday Ross tweeted this:

The media commentary that Ross is referring to is an LA Times review of the show. It is entirely true that Ross has done sex work to survive. She’s since built a career for herself and is now CEO of a non-profit organization, Trans Tech Social, which exists to help other trans people find work in IT. Calling Ross a “sex worker” is no more accurate than calling Roz Kaveney a “sex worker”. Roz, of course, is generally described as an author, a poet, a critic, and a political activist. She’s all of those things too. But Roz is white and has a degree from Oxford, while Angelica Ross is black. The media stereotype of black trans women is very hard to shake.

On balance I think Jenner will do good for the trans community. However, that doesn’t mean that she’ll be good for all of us, or be good all of the time. What she’s doing may not even be good for her. Working with the media is always a case of holding a snake by the tail. You never know when it is going to turn around and sink its poison fangs into you.

Once Upon A Time – Season 1

Thanks to the Evil Pusher Woman (a.k.a. Tansy Rayner Roberts) I have become addicted to the TV show, Once Upon A Time. I knew that getting a Netflix subscription was going to be trouble one way or another. Thus far I have binge-watched my way through season 1, all 22 episodes of it. There are 3 more seasons on Netflix and a fifth season is apparently planned. Doubtless many of you know far more about the series than I do, but I figured it would amuse you to see my thoughts after just one season. Feel free to laugh, but perhaps not too pointedly in the comments.

I must admit to feeling a bit guilty about liking the show, seeing as to a certain extent it is a giant rip-off of Fables. Then again, Bill can hardly claim copyright on fairy stories, and the show’s writers have done a decent job of making the story quite different. The only major point of commonality is having a heap of fairy tale characters trapped in our world. In any case, Jane Espenson is one of the major creative forces behind the project, so it is gonna be good, right?

The principle interest for me is seeing how the show makes use of the various fairytale characters, and comparing that to Fables. I rather liked the way that Fables made Prince Charming a serial seducer of princesses whom all of the women now despise. Once Upon a Time has a seemingly endless stream of cookie-cutter handsome princes, though only Snow’s Prince Charming gets a major role, and he’s just dumb. Then again, I really liked what the show did with Red Riding Hood, and their use of the Beauty & The Beast story.

With the show being a Disney property, they are required to throw in major Disney characters that are not from fairy tales. I really liked how they used the Mad Hatter. Mulan also seems very interesting, and a much more believable warrior princess than Snow. I am waiting with steadily decreasing patience for Ariel’s first appearance. If it doesn’t happen soon there may be some muttering about bias against redheads.

The first season is all about Snow and Charming’s daughter arriving to break the curse that has all of the fairy tale people trapped in a small town in Maine. I’m not sure that it needed 22 episodes, but then again there’s always the question of what to do next. Thus far what I have seen of season 2 is doing OK, but I worry about things down the road. With time, any long-running series will run out of plot ideas and descend into silliness.

Obviously a major attraction of the series is the female-led cast. Snow White, her Evil Stepmother (Regina), and her daughter (Emma) are all major characters. Red Riding Hood and her Grandma, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty and Belle have all had important roles, as did King Midas’s daughter, whom I think the show invented. In addition to Charming we have Snow’s grandson (Henry) and Rumpelstiltskin as major male characters. When you throw in the supporting characters, especially all seven dwarfs, I’m sure there are more men than women on the show. But it is so rare to see more than one or two token women that the show seems female-dominated.

I haven’t done any proper Bechdel Test analysis, but I’d be prepared to bet that Snow, Regina and Emma spend the majority of their conversations talking about Charming and Henry. Then again, at the start of season two we’ve had Snow, Emma, Mulan and Sleeping Beauty set off on a quest together, which is pretty awesome.

Emma’s last name is Swan. I’m assuming that she’s a swan maiden of some sort, and that Henry’s missing father will turn out to be a prince called Lohengrin (or possibly Logan as the show will assume that a US audience would balk at a complicated German name).

The show makes to usual clumsy Hollywood efforts at diversity. There have been a few non-white characters (including Lancelot), but none of them major and they seem to die or become evil very quickly. Mulan is the only one likely to have staying power, because I don’t think Disney will allow them to kill her off. I can’t remember seeing any QUILTBAG characters.

Fairy stories are, of course, moral tales, and the show is no exception. The main planks of its morality appear to be the value of true love and the importance of personal freedom and self-expression (as long as you are cis and straight?). Duty of parents to children is absolute, but duty of children to parents is mostly frowned upon. Goodness only knows what my grandparents would have made of that, but the world changes, probably for the better.

Anyway, it is an interesting show, and I shall keep watching it to see how it develops. If you haven’t seen it, and can stand a show with lots of women in it, you might want to give it a try.